Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of LMGONCA
LMGONCAFlag for Portugal

asked on

How to refer to a LINQ field with a variable?

I've a LINQ query working fine, then if I want to refer to a returned field from that query in LINQ I use something like:

MyObject.FieldName

And that also works fine.

Now: what I need is a method where I can use:

MyObject.%variable%.

Imagine I want to implement the following:

string GetFieldValue(string MyFieldName)
{
return MyLINQQuery.MyFieldName.ToString(); //where MyLINQQuery is a public LINQ query object and MyFieldName will be a variable specified in the method.
}

How can I do this?
Avatar of novynov
novynov
Flag of United States of America image

Well, the simplest thing that comes to mind relies on you knowing the complete set of field names beforehand. If so, you could just create a switch statement something like code snippet #1 below.

The statements below assume that the return from MyLINQQuery is a MyObject.

It's not exactly a pretty solution, but it would work. The deal is, you are needing to map fieldnames to (compiled) property names. This situation would come up in any similar scenario - not just with using LINQ. I suppose another option would be to use reflection...it would be more flexible...but seems overkill.

Now, regardless of how you do it, there is a bit of an inefficiency here, in that you are retrieving the whole entity/object from the datasource (I assume it's probably a db), and then only selecting one field from it.

That said, you could create a custom query that did a similar switch statement, but did a custom Select() expression based on the field name. This would lower the payload coming back from your datasource - as the only thing returned would be the string.

Let me know if this helps, or if you need more info.

#1
switch(MyFieldName)
{
    case "Field1":
      return MyObject.Field1;
    case "Field2": //An int
      return MyObject.Field2.ToString();
    default:
      return String.Empty;
 
}
 
#2
 
Expression<Func<MyObject,string>> selectExpression = null;
switch(MyFieldName)
{
 
    case "Field1":
      selectExpression = (o => o.Field1);
      break;
   case "Field2":
     selectExpression = (o => o.Field2.ToString());
     break;
    default:
     throw new ApplicationException("Invalid field name.");
     break;
}
 
 
return context.MyObjects.Where(<whatever filter you are using>).Select(selectExpression);

Open in new window

Avatar of LMGONCA

ASKER

I don't know the field names....if that was the case, I could use the normal properties names.....

MyObject.FieldName = "xxx";

Basically I am calling that method from a dinamically created method...

I need something that abstract the fieldnames.
Forgive me if I am confused. In your code above, you give an example of something like:

MyObject.FieldName

Doesn't this mean that you know what "MyObject" is, and by extension, what its public properties are?

Can you help me understand?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Fernando Soto
Fernando Soto
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of LMGONCA

ASKER

I have tried your great example, but I am still facing a problem :(

In the line:

public IEnumerable<Entity> MyLINQQuery;

I got the following error:

Compiler Error Message: CS0308: The non-generic type 'System.Collections.IEnumerable' cannot be used with type arguments

I have added:

using System.Linq.Dynamic;
using System.Collections;

Do you know why? Thanks.
Avatar of LMGONCA

ASKER

I found out why the error was:

I need to use:

using System.Collections.Generic;

Instead of:

using System.Collections;

Working now!

Great - thanks!
Avatar of LMGONCA

ASKER

Meantime I saw I cannot use any more the MyLINQQuery object the following way:

MyLiNQQuery.Fieldname = "XXX";

Do you know why? Isn't there a way to keep both access methods?.....
Hi LMGONCA;


I am glad you got it working. On the other matter about not being able to use this any more:

MyLiNQQuery.Fieldname = "XXX";

I do not see why not can you  post the code so that I can follow the logic.

Fernando
Avatar of LMGONCA

ASKER

Is quite a big class now, but let's see if I can the involved extracts of it:

public class My_Entity
{

    MyDbDataContext MyDb = new MyDbDataContext();
    public Entity LQEntity = new Entity(); //here now I could change to: public public IEnumerable<Entity> LQEntity....

//lots of code here

string GetFieldValue(string MyFieldName)
{
    // Select the single filed in the variable MyFieldName from the query
    var fieldQuery = LQEntity.AsQueryable().Select(MyFieldName);
    // Used to return the value
    String retField = "";
    // Enumerate the single record with the single field returned
    foreach (var f in fieldQuery)
    {
        retField = f.ToString();
    }
    // Return the field value.
    return retField;
}

}

***************************************************

That was the My_Entity class

Now I consume this class like this:

My_Entity MyEntity = new My_Entity();
MyEntity.LQEntity.Code = MyValue; //here I do access the LQEntity with that object.fieldname method - and I do this in many many places...(and here is great to have the field name appearing automatically to you as you type)

Now in some places I've a datatable with the same field / column structure than the LQEntity entity and to avoid do something like this:

MyTable.Column["ColumnName"] = MyEntity.LQEntity.FieldName;
....dozens of fields....

That's why I want that possibility to use the LQEntity as a variable name, something like:

for each (DataColumn MyCol in MyTable.Columns)
{
MyCol[MyCol.ColumnName] = MyEntity.GetFieldValue(MyCol.ColumnName);
}

Got it? :)
Hi LMGONCA;

Looking at this statement, MyLiNQQuery.Fieldname, If Fieldname is the string value that holds the name of the column you wish to modify then that will not work. About the only way to make something like that is to us Reflections, this is a subject I am not too well versed on.

Fernando