Edited text of question
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsI am using named pipe mechanism for interproces communication . My server programm cteates
local named pipe with one pipe instance, connects to the pipe and read. After some timeout it disconnect from pipe and close pipe handle. . After disconnecting and closing the pipe handle,
server tries to create pipe with the same name and parameters and connects to it , but GetLastError
back error 231 (All pipe instances are busy. ERROR_PIPE_BUSY). In the client side I connect to the
pipe with CreateFile and write. I never close the pipe handle in the client programm. What's wrong in this scenario and what's the rihgt way for using named pipe ?
Yes. I close client pipe handle.
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: eelkoPosted on 1998-04-05 at 03:14:41ID: 1258002
Shouldn't you close the pipe handle in the client program ?