Note that the code above is for 95 and maybe for 98.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsI try to use code snippet below to delete the executable itself after run but fail , I don't know why, would you plz help?
========
#include <windows.h>
int main()
{
......//some here...
HMODULE module = GetModuleHandle(0);
CHAR buf[MAX_PATH];
GetModuleFileName(module, buf, sizeof buf);
__asm {
lea eax, buf
push 0 // argument to ExitProcess
push 0 // return address of ExitProcess
push eax // argument to DeleteFile
push ExitProcess // return address of DeleteFile
push module // argument to UnmapViewOfFile
push DeleteFile // return address of UnmapViewOfFile
push UnmapViewOfFile
ret
}
return 0;
}
===
Regards
Yinan
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Oh , i miss one line,the code is this:
====
#include <windows.h>
int main()
{
HMODULE module = GetModuleHandle(0);
CHAR buf[MAX_PATH];
GetModuleFileName(module, buf, sizeof buf);
CloseHandle(HANDLE(4));
__asm {
lea eax, buf
push 0 // argument to ExitProcess
push 0 // return address of ExitProcess
push eax // argument to DeleteFile
push ExitProcess // return address of DeleteFile
push module // argument to UnmapViewOfFile
push DeleteFile // return address of UnmapViewOfFile
push UnmapViewOfFile
ret
}
return 0;
}
=====
Wyn(Yinan), in 95/98 apps can't deletes yourself!
Only in Nt/2000 you can use MoveFileEx for this.
In my practice, I use for this next trick:
1.From my apps write to disk some little apps, that
make only 2 things: delay (2 sec) and delete main apps.
2. Lunch this small apps.
3. Close main
Now, after end of small, in HD stay only small apps,
that can't help your feind.
>>Oh , i miss one line,the code is this:
Well, it changes the whole stuff! Inspite of that it works, it is an ungly, ugly hack!
#include <windows.h>
void main()
{
HINSTANCE hModule=GetModuleHandle(0)
CHAR buf[MAX_PATH];
GetModuleFileName(hModule,
HINSTANCE hKernel=GetModuleHandle("K
DWORD pExitProcess=(DWORD)GetPro
DWORD pDeleteFile=(DWORD)GetProc
DWORD pUnmapViewOfFile=(DWORD)Un
CloseHandle(HANDLE(4));
__asm {
lea eax, buf
push 0 // argument to ExitProcess
push 0 // return address of ExitProcess
push eax // argument to DeleteFile
push pExitProcess // return address of DeleteFile
push hModule // argument to UnmapViewOfFile
push pDeleteFile // return address of UnmapViewOfFile
push pUnmapViewOfFile
ret
}
}
As to the following code:
#include <windows.h>
int main()
{
HMODULE module = GetModuleHandle(0);
CHAR buf[MAX_PATH];
GetModuleFileName(module, buf, sizeof buf);
DeleteFile(buf);
}
Seems this really does not work even on 95. The reason I thought it would work was the SDK documentation about the DeleteFile:
<<Windows 95: The DeleteFile function deletes a file even if it is open for normal I/O or as a memory-mapped file.>>
For what its worth I wrote the following code to run under W95. It would run then delete itself.
// Allows an executable to delete itself
#include <windows.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <tchar.h>
int WINAPI WinMain(HINSTANCE h, HINSTANCE h2, LPSTR psz, int n)
{
// Is this the original EXE or the clone EXE ?
// If command line = 1 arg this is the original
// If the command line > 1 arg this is the clone
if (__argc==1)
{
// Original EXE, spawn clone EXE to delete this one
// Copy this EXE into users TEMP dir.
TCHAR sz_path_orig[_MAX_PATH], sz_path_clone[_MAX_PATH];
GetModuleFileName(NULL,sz_
GetTempPath(_MAX_PATH,sz_p
GetTempFileName(sz_path_cl
CopyFile(sz_path_orig,sz_p
// Open clone EXE using FILE_FLAG_DELETE_ON_CLOSE,
// when it terminates.
HANDLE hfile=CreateFile(sz_path_c
// Spawn clone EXE by passig our EXE process's handle and path
TCHAR sz_cmdline[512];
HANDLE hproc_orig = OpenProcess(SYNCHRONIZE,TR
wsprintf(sz_cmdline,__TEXT
STARTUPINFO si;
ZeroMemory(&si,sizeof(si))
si.cb=sizeof(si);
PROCESS_INFORMATION pi;
CreateProcess(NULL,sz_cmdl
CloseHandle(hproc_orig);
CloseHandle(hfile);
// This original process can now terminate
}
else
{
// Clone EXE : When original EXE terminates, delete it.
HANDLE hproc_orig = (HANDLE)_ttoi(__targv[1]);
WaitForSingleObject(hproc_
CloseHandle(hproc_orig);
DeleteFile(__targv[2]);
// Do any clean up stuff here
}
return 0;
}
If you need an NT/2000 version I could play around with this code to see if it can be made to work or else you can use this as a base to work from but you said earlier that you need code to run under 95 and this will do the trick
Cheers - Gavin
->>>Well, it changes the whole stuff!
=========
Yes, I just want to know why it changes the whole stuff,what does that line actually do indeed!??
i.e.:
CloseHandle(HANDLE(4));
->>>HINSTANCE hKernel=GetModuleHandle("K
DWORD pExitProcess=(DWORD)GetPro
(hKernel,"ExitProcess");
DWORD pDeleteFile=(DWORD)GetProc
DWORD pUnmapViewOfFile=(DWORD)Un
===============
Why use GetProcAddress? Why not use API name directly as the original version do?
Best Regards
Yinan
NickRepin
I know that it doesn't work on NT kernels - I said as much in my post.
Earlier in the series of posts it was stated that the user wanted code that runs on Win 9x which the code I posted does and it is not a hack it uses standard Win32 APIs so it seems to me it fitted the requirements elucidated by the user.
Cheers - Gavin
NickRepin
Please don't misunderstand my last post - I did not intend to claim that my answer is "more fit for you" and I don't believe I did.
I only acknowledged your comment that my code will not work under the NT kernel (which I stated when I posted the code) and that it would work under the 9x kernel which was what the original poster required.
No offence was intended......
Cheers - Gavin
hi to all,
i think that the simplest solutions which works under all operating systems, is the use
of a .BAT file.
in your app you create the .BAT-file and write only only line in it
delete app.exe
then you call this BAT-file immediatly before you close your app. that is all.
and it works fine.
regards to all
titz
>>My point is to become aware of how/why those code work/doesn't work.
When executing an .EXE, Windows opens it as a so-called section (something like CreateFileMapping), then maps the file into memory by MapViewOfFile.
By design (at least, on the Windows versions where the code above works) the handle returned by CreateFileMapping???("file
To delete itself, the executable must UnmapViewOfFile first, then close the file mapping object which in turn releases the file locks that prevent deletion. Then you can delete the file.
Once you called UnmapViewOfFile, the memory pointed by HINSTANCE becomes invalid, so if you called UnmapViewOfFile from within the C code, you would get an exception, for example:
address instructions
00400000 MZ... (EXE header) == HINSTANCE
...
0040332A push 00400000 ; HINSTANCE
00403330 call UnmapViewOfFile
00403336 ... other code here ....
UnmapViewOfFile unmaps all memory section beginning from 00400000. When UnmapViewOfFile returns, the IP (istruction pointer) register points to 00403336 which is not a valid piece of memory any more.
Because of this we have to place all the code to be executed on the stack, because the stack is not a part of the executable image, and it is not affected by UnmapViewOfFile().
DWORD pUnmapViewOfFile=(DWORD)Un
The code above usually (by the compiler design) returns the address of the import thunk, which is a part of the executable image, and not the true address of the UnmapViewOfFile:
address instructions
00400000 MZ... (EXE header) == HINSTANCE
...
00420000 jmp 77BF0500 ; import thunk
... .....
77B00000 MZ... (KERNEL32.DLL header) == HINSTANCE
....
77BF0500 proc UnmapViewOfFile
.... ......
So actually pUnmapViewOfFile points to a jump instruction to UnmapViewOfFile (00420000), and not to the UnmapViewOfFile itself (77BF0500). It's ok, because while we execute this particular jmp, it is still valid.
On the other hand,
DWORD pDeleteFile=(DWORD)GetProc
this code returns the true address (say 77BF0600), which is in the memory space of KERNEL32.DLL. We cannot use jmp thunks here, because they will be unmapped after UnmapViewOfFile.
P.S. It would be fine if you gave me additional points for such a time-consuming explanation.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: NickRepinPosted on 2001-08-19 at 00:04:02ID: 6403022
This will not work at all on NT/2000/XP, inspite of the hack used.
Probably it will work on 95/98, but the following is much easier:
#include <windows.h>
int main()
{
HMODULE module = GetModuleHandle(0);
CHAR buf[MAX_PATH];
GetModuleFileName(module, buf, sizeof buf);
DeleteFile(buf);
}