Question

setting a object to null vs calling a dispose() function

Asked by: mrwhipple

Hello,

I'm looking at optimizing code and I was wondering what was the best way to dispose of objects.  Currently a lot of the code is setting things equal to null.  But I was wondering if calling the dispose method of an object would be a better way to do release all memory that the object was taking up?

Thanks!

This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.

Subscribe now for full access to Experts Exchange and get

Instant Access to this Solution

  • Plus...
  • 30 Day FREE access, no risk, no obligation
  • Collaborate with the world's top tech experts
  • Unlimited access to our exclusive solution database
  • Never be left without tech help again

Subscribe Now

Asked On
2008-04-30 at 13:43:05ID23366857
Tags

C#

Topics

C# Programming Language

,

Visual Studio

,

Microsoft Visual C#.Net

Participating Experts
5
Points
500
Comments
9

Trusted by hundreds of thousands everyday for fast, accurate and reliable tech support.

  • "The time we save is the biggest benefit of Experts Exchange to Warner Bros. What could take multiple guys 2 hours or more each to find is accessed in around 15 minutes on Experts Exchange." Mike Kapnisakis, Warner Bros.
  • "Our team likes having a resource that is more secure than just using Google and most experts using this service really know their stuff. It's nice to look here first versus using Google." Dayna Sellner, Lockheed Martin
  • "Anytime that I've been stumped with a problem, 9 out of 10 times Experts Exchange has either the accepted solution or an open discussion of the potential solution to the problem." Kenny Red, eBay Inc.

See what Experts Exchange can do for you.

Got a question?

We've got the answer.

Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.

Screenshot of Experts Exchange Knowledgebase

Need individual assistance?

Our experts are ready to help.

If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.

Screenshot of Experts Exchange Knowledgebase

Want to learn from the best?

Read articles from industry experts.

Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.

Screenshot of an Article

Working on a long term project?

Store your work and research.

Save solutions to your questions, answers you’ve discovered through searching plus helpful articles in your personal knowledgebase for easy future access.

Screenshot of Experts Exchange Knowledgebase

Access the answers to your technology questions today.

Subscribe Now

30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.

What Makes Experts Exchange Unique?

Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Trusted by the world's most respected brands.

image of each brand's logo

Faithfully serving IT professionals since 1996.

Experts Exchange Logo

Try it out and discover for yourself.

Subscribe Now

30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.

Related Solutions

  1. To NULL or not to NULL?
    I was reading a C++ web site which had a list of C++ rules. One of the rules is "Never compare or assign a pointer NULL. Use '0' instead." What is the advantage of using zero instead of NULL?
  2. Optimization
    Iam dealing with a project that involves code optimization and have a question on static variables This is a function that calculates realtime information based on real time data.So this function will be called as long as we get real time data and the no:of times called ma...
  3. Select Subquery in db2
    I have 4 table in database db2, I Want to know cycle time in table progress dispo With the no dispo is key. A. Table dispo header1 DISHD00F {NO_DISPO, NO_MOV} {A12345, 100} {A2222, 102} {F1520, 205} B. Table Header material Transaction STOTR...
  4. is null vs <> ''
    Why is it that when I use ncoaaddress <> '' and ncoaaddress is not null, I receive different results? I thought "is not null" and "<> '' " are equivalent. What is the difference bewteen the two when using MYSQL and ASP?
  5. Access <> (not equal to) query doesn't return NULL
    Field forecast_addedfields.cstatus has three possible values: "Alive", "Dead", and NULL. The problem is that the recordset from the SQL statement "WHERE forecast_addedfields.cstatus<>'Dead'" does not return the records where forecast_a...
  6. Properly dispoing a System.Windows.Forms.UserContr…
    Hello, I have an applicaiton with many usercontrols. Each usercontrol includes many controls (dropdown, grids) . I am still not clear on how to properly dispose each usercontrol. Each usercontrol is simply embedded into a MDI form, so there are no external references to speci...

Free Tech Articles

  1. WARNING: 5 Reasons why you should NEVER fix a computer for free.
    It is in our nature to love the puzzle. We are obsessed. The lot of us. We love puzzles. We love the challenge. We thrive on finding the answer. We hate disarray. It bothers us deep in our soul. W...
  2. SCCM OSD Basic troubleshooting
    SCCM 2007 OSD is a fantastic way to deploy operating systems, however, like most things SCCM issues can sometimes be difficult to resolve due to the sheer volume of logs to sift through and the dispe...
  3. Migrate Small Business Server 2003 to Exchange 2010 and Windows 2008 R2
    This guide is intended to provide step by step instructions on how to migrate from Small Business Server 2003 to Windows 2008 R2 with Exchange 2010. For this migration to work you will need the fo...
  4. Create a Win7 Gadget
    This article shows you how to create a simple "Gadget" -- a sort of mini-application supported by Windows 7 and Vista. Gadgets can be dropped anywhere on the desktop to provide instant information, ...
  5. Outlook continually prompting for username and password
    There have been a lot of questions recently regarding Outlook prompting for a username and password whilst using Exchange 2007. There are a few reasons why this would happen and I will try to cover t...
  6. Backup Exchange 2010 Information Store using Windows Backup
    There seems to be quite a lot of confusion around the ability to backup Exchange 2010 using the built in Windows Backup feature. This stems from the omission of this feature prior to Exchange 2007 s...

Cloud Class Webinars

  1. Avoiding Bugs in Microsoft Access
    Alison Balter takes and in-depth look at avoiding bugs in Access. In this webinar you will learn about using the immediate window to debug your applications, invoking the debugger, using breakpoints to troubleshoot, stepping through code, setting the next statement to execute, ...
  2. Top 10 Best New Features in Visio 2010
    Scott Helmers gives live demonstrations of the top 10 new features in Visio 2010. This webinar will teach you how to create compelling diagrams by adding shapes to the page with a single click, linking the shapes in a diagram to data in Excel (or SQL Server, or SharePoint), ...
  3. IT Consultant Business Secrets Revealed
    Michael Munger, Experts Exchange tech pro and IT consultant, pulls back the curtain on his very successful businesses and answers question on every IT consultant and business owner should know about. He shares secrets on what he did to solve the 5 most common problems in IT, ...
  4. Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity
    Quest CTO, Mike Billon, gives an overview of the steps involved in building a dunamic disaster recovery plan. Through case studies and an examination of software/hardware tooles for monitoring and testing, you'll gain a better understandin of where you are, where you want ...
  5. Organize Your Visio Diagrams with Containers and Lists
    Scott Helmers uses cross functional flowcharts, wireframe diagrams, data graphic legends and seating charts to teach you: how to ustilize all three new structured diagram components in Visio 2010, the best practices for organizeing shapes in previous version of Visio, how to organize ...
  6. How to Us Objects, Properties, Events and Methods in Microsoft Access
    Alison Dalter gives an in-depbth look at objects, properties, events and methods in Microsoft Access. In this webinar you will learn about using the object browser, referring to objects, working with properties and methods, working with object variables, understanding the ...

Join the Community

Give a Little. Get a Lot.

Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.

Join the Community

Answers

 

by: angelIIIPosted on 2008-04-30 at 13:48:27ID: 21474413

if the object is complex, the Dispose can make sure all internally used resources are cleaned up explicitly.

 

by: nsangaPosted on 2008-04-30 at 14:15:19ID: 21474608

dispose is the best when cleaning the resources rather than setting to null.......

but as .net has inbuilt garbage collector, you don't even need to worry about that.....either you set it null or dispose manually, the object will be cleaned with just a bit of difference in time........

when there is a need of resources, GC is called automatically.........

 

by: ororiolePosted on 2008-04-30 at 14:17:14ID: 21474617

Yes and um, no. When the garbage collector runs, it looks at all object reference variables to see if , well, they reference an object. Then it has to see if the object is actually in use. For eaxample, you might have an object foo that contains a reference to object bar. The reference variable to foo was on the stack, so it is gone now, but the object foo is on the heap, so it still has a reference variable to bar. The garbage collector puts bar in a queue while it continues to look because it might also be referenced somewhere else. If it determines that the object is NOT referenced anywhere else, then it is put in the "unreachable" queue. then the garbage collector (GC) stops running.

The next time the GC runs (each time it runs is called a "generation") it will look at the unreachable queue for the last cycle mark the memory for bar as free, remove it from the unreachable queue and compact the heap so it is contiguous. So it has a lot to do. An object is usually cleaned up in 2 to 3 generations.

If you mark the reference var as null, th garbage collector can more qucikly see that nothing is referencing that object. But it only makes a minor difference in GC run time if everywhere you set all reference vars to null. If you leave some with a reference, its a waste of time.

If you call dispose() you save the GC time for that one object because it doesnt have to look all over. It will immediately put the reference to it in "unreachable" because its been disposed. And you save the GC a generation for that object.

Too much information? Actually this is simplified.

The "no" part  comes in because you scan help GC a tiny bit more by calling dispose() AND set the var to null. Why? Even tho the memory is on the unreachable queue, GC has to check other allocated memory to see if any references point to it, as in the first generation I mentioned above. If there is a null in it it knows it doesnt have to look there. BUT that is really minor. Dispose() by itself helps more adding the null, again, you will never notice.

Also more to "no" part: Only part of the framework objects implment Dispose. Most places I've worked dont bother calling
Dispose() or setting vars to null. Its considered good practice, but even with both you will not notice a difference in most apps. BUT if you have lots of web hits for web apps, or lots (millions) of database access or lots (millions) of memory use in winForms, then you notice it. Then you should do it. You can also implemenht the IDispose() interface yourself on your own objects.

So, setting the ref var to null, does very, very close to nothing.

 

by: ororiolePosted on 2008-04-30 at 14:20:26ID: 21474638

oh sorry angelIII and nsanga, I got kinda verbose. While I was writing that tome, you guys posted, I wasnt trying to steal anyones answer. Man, I gotta keep my answers shorter.

 

by: CyrexCore2kPosted on 2008-04-30 at 18:14:05ID: 21475830

Just a minor tidbit calling close or dispose on a SQLConnection is not just recommended on ASP.Net it's a requirement if you get any significant traffic. If you simply set it to null or let it go out of scope the connection will remain in the connection pool for hours. Depending on the site of your pool a meager 10 visitors just visiting a few pages can easily take down your site and a single user could if they wanted to by simply clicking refresh several dozen times.

 

by: dstanley9Posted on 2008-04-30 at 21:11:55ID: 21476479

Need to clarify a couple of wrong things here:

1) Calling Dispose() does not make GC run sooner.  It simply (if used properly) clenas up any _unmanaged_ resources that normally would not get cleaned up until GC runs.  Which is why Cyrex is correct is saying that calling Dispose is more or less required on data connections to improved scalability.
2) Setting an object to null if it is the last reference actually does nothing for improving collection.  The GC is actually smart enough to know that no more references to that object are made and so can collect the object after the last reference to the object is used (potentially before the reference is set to NULL).

Bottom Line:
Any object that implements IDisposable should be disposed of as soon as the object is no longer needed.  A clean way to do this is to create disposable objects with a using block:

using(SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(connString))
{
  ...
}

this will ensure that the object is disposed at the end of the block even if an exception is thrown.

 

by: ororiolePosted on 2008-04-30 at 22:22:22ID: 21476652

1.I didnt not say it makes "GC run sooner". It will reduce the amount of work GC has to do meaning the GC can complete its running state in less time. It doesnt run sooner.

2. Setting the reference to null is really pretty useless as I said. But the GC is only smart enough to know when the object is not used because it has to build a graph of all the objects that are reachable from the root references. It does this by by first adding all the objects that are referenced by the root refeence, then recursively adding objects that are referenced by any added object. I did not say that setting the last reference to null does anything to improve collection. By definition, if it is the last reference, the GC would be done with that graph path at that point regardless.  Otherwise, That would be like continuing to look for something after you found it.

Improvements in the amount of CPU time used by GC will be in microseconds, which is why this is all academic unless you have millions of managed resources.

 

by: CyrexCore2kPosted on 2008-04-30 at 23:24:23ID: 21476807

Actually I don't think anyone said anything about dispose causing GC to run sooner so I'm not sure where you got that idea dstanley9.

mrwhipple from what I've read, GC seems to be intended mainly for handling memory cleanup and it does that job fairly well. However, if there are any other resources that are being tied up say files, some sort of limited pool, network bandwidth or whatever else you should make sure that you release those resources by whatever means applicable to that resource or object. While the IDisposable allows GC to  clean up more than just unused memory GC is not designed to detect these other resources which means you have no idea how long that will take.

What this means is that generally speaking you don't need to worry about objects like hashtables, collections, dictionaries, strings, arrays or any other objects who's primary function is to simply mess around with and allocate memory. Some other common objects that you should deal with yourself are objects like SQLConnection, Socket, TcpClient, TcpListener. There are plenty more but I hope I've given you enough information to extrapolate the rest.

Hopefully that all makes sense.

 

by: mrwhipplePosted on 2008-05-01 at 07:43:29ID: 31453938

This was exactly the information I was looking for.  Thanks!

20120131-EE-VQP-002

3 Ways to Join

30-Day Free Trial

The Experts

98% positive feedback on 31,087 answers since March 2000. angeliii is a Microsoft Most Valuable Professional for his work with MS SQL Server & Develoment.

He has also proven his knowledge of Visual Basic Programming, PHP Scripting and Oracle Databases.

The Experts

97% positive feedback on 10,752 answers since July 2000. lrmoore has more than 18 years experience in the networking industry.

The six-time Mircosoft MVPs specialties include firewalls, virtual private networking, and network management.

Testimonials

"...and excellent source for support... Kind of like having your very own IT dept." Electriciansnet

Testimonials

"I was apprehensive at signing up at first. However... it has already made my life as an IT administrator much easier." JaCrews

Testimonials

"WOW! You guys have great, active, and knowledgeable people on here." moore50

Business Clients

Business Clients

In the Press

"If you’ve got a question... Experts Exchange can supply an answer.”

In the Press

"...an invaluable aid for both IT professionals and those who require tech support."

In the Press

"where IT professionals provide quick answers on just about any topic"

Business Account Plans

Loading Advertisement...