Me again :)
You can "forget" to activate some procedure . SAVE for example .
Don't delivery to net full applications .
Just an idea .
Regards,
Nick
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsWhich is the most effective way for protecting shareware?
I found a lot of different protection components for time limitations, anti-disassembling etc. but I wonder if someone of you has experiences in using them; did someone made positive/negative experiences with some of these protection-components..?
sprutzli
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
I'm using a software protection product, SoftLocx, from BitArts. I'm using the SoftLocx OCX to customize my licensing and wrapping my EXE with another feature of the product for disassembly deterrence. If I were you, I'd use a commercial wrapper product for both licensing (demo -> purchase) and disassembly deterrence.
==========================
The best recommendation I can make about shareware protection is to limit the features or functionality of your code when it is in demo mode.
The software I've found to be the best protected is as such.
Have your application on startup run an algorithm to determine a machine specific password. Use something like MB or CPU serial numbers, which can be pulled in code. Have your application email you this information, so that at your end you can determine what "password" your application has determined for itself. You can then give user this code on payment.
Like most others have already said, just write the app. with demo priviledges without the code.
Software protections schemes are easier to crack than they are to write... and those warez crackers have IQ's that are way above room temp so you better be really sharp or they will have your app on the warez groups the day after you distribute it.
-Never distribute a full version of your shareware on the web....
-Never depend on an activation code to unlock your demo for full functionallity...warez puppies love to write key-generator programs.
-If at all possible have your app check a list of authorized users on the web each time before it runs.
This gives you a server log entry that shows the users IP address... if the same registered app starts getting logged from many differing IP's then you can remove it's authorizing data from the web and it will no longer function ;-)
-Embed personal info about the user into the app... having it self modify at the direction of the end user is best..it makes them nervous about passing the program around.
-Have the program modify itself as it runs... this makes crackers very nervous... they will drive themselves crazy trying to figure out what is going on... crackers are always looking for differences between a registered app and an unregistered copy...or between 2 different registered copies...this gives them valuable clues about your protection methods.... but if your exe is ever changing it will be maddening ;-)
-Use a LOT of different areas of the exe to store protection data in... and make the data alter before each execution.... call different check routines randomly... this makes sure that eventually one of the routines will hit and catch the unauthorized user.
-Make liberal use of encryption... the simple RC4 stream cypher will do wonders....
-Use various machine identifiers in your protection code...motherboard id, user names,hd serial, bios type..os type..etc
Maybe the best protection is to make a good program and sell it at a very reasonable price and have all the documentation only in written form.... warez types hate to scan in documents... it's not as much fun as looking over your exe with a hex-editor :-)
Put a statement in your about box or help file that says that your program can defeat a firewall and send data to you over the net that will identify them as an unauthorized user....this will scare off many bootleggers.
many will scoff and say it's hogwash.... but actually there is a very simple way to have a delphi app send data through a firewall... takes only a few lines of code and I tested it against BlackIce,ZoneAlarm and Norton... and it works fine... you can send data both in and out.....the method is so basic and simple that when you tell someone how to do it they say "Why didn't I think of that!" ..so just think about it awhile and it will come to you how to do it.... but I'm not sure about the legality of using it...of course if you warn the user that the program can do this then one would think.........?
If you need info about making self-modifying delphi exe's then email me and I will send you a useful unit I wrote...
You have 12 open questions today that need your attention. ADMINISTRATION WILL BE CONTACTING YOU SHORTLY. Moderators Computer101, Netminder, Mindphaser or I will return to finalize these as soon as possible if after 7 days no response by the Asker. EXPERTS--> please post closing recommendations before that time.
Below are your open questions as of today. Questions which have been inactive for 21 days or longer are considered to be abandoned and for those, your options are:
1. Accept a Comment As Answer (use the button next to the Expert's name).
2. Close the question if the information was not useful to you, but may help others. You must tell the participants why you wish to do this, and allow for Expert response. This choice will include a refund to you, and will move this question to our PAQ (Previously Asked Question) database. If you found information outside this question thread, please add it.
3. Ask Community Support to help split points between participating experts, or just comment here with details and we'll respond with the process.
4. Delete the question (if it has no potential value for others).
--> Post comments for expert of your intention to delete and why
--> YOU CANNOT DELETE A QUESTION with comments; special handling by a Moderator is required.
For special handling needs, please post a zero point question in the link below and include the URL (question QID/link) that it regards with details.
http://www.experts-exchang
Please click this link for Help Desk, Guidelines/Member Agreement and the Question/Answer process. http://www.experts-exchang
Click you Member Profile to view your question history and please keep them updated. If you are a KnowledgePro user, use the Power Search option to find them.
Questions which are LOCKED with a Proposed Answer but do not help you, should be rejected with comments added. When you grade the question less than an A, please comment as to why. This helps all involved, as well as others who may access this item in the future. PLEASE DO NOT AWARD POINTS TO ME.
To view your open questions, please click the following link(s) and keep them all current with updates.
http://www.experts-exchang
http://www.experts-exchang
http://www.experts-exchang
http://www.experts-exchang
http://www.experts-exchang
http://www.experts-exchang
http://www.experts-exchang
http://www.experts-exchang
http://www.experts-exchang
http://www.experts-exchang
http://www.experts-exchang
To view your locked questions, please click the following link(s) and evaluate the proposed answer.
http://www.experts-exchang
***** E X P E R T S P L E A S E ****** Leave your closing recommendations.
If you are interested in the cleanup effort, please click this link
http://www.experts-exchang
------> POINTS FOR EXPERTS awaiting comments are listed in the links below
http://www.experts-exchang
http://www.experts-exchang
Moderators will finalize this question if in @7 days Asker has not responded. This will be moved to the PAQ (Previously Asked Questions) at zero points, deleted or awarded.
Thanks everyone.
Moondancer
Moderator @ Experts Exchange
sprutzli:
This old question needs to be finalized -- accept an answer, split points, or get a refund. For information on your options, please click here-> http:/help/closing.jsp#1
EXPERTS:
Post your closing recommendations! No comment means you don't care.
Hi!
No comment has been added lately and this question is therefore classified abandoned.
If asker wishes to close the question, then refer to
http://www.experts-exchang
Otherwise, I will leave a recommendation in the Cleanup topic area that this question is:
Split between ginsonic, aikimark, YodaMage and Gwena
Please leave any comments here within the next seven days. It is assumed that any participant not responding to this request is no longer interested in its final disposition.
PLEASE DO NOT ACCEPT THIS COMMENT AS AN ANSWER!
...Snehanshu
EE Cleanup Volunteer
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: ginsonicPosted on 2001-12-15 at 22:50:26ID: 6679402
You can't protect you software .
In the happy case you give a headache to the cracker .
I use a lots of different protections ( more security codes more time spend to crack ).
Add hidden code that will activate later ( 2-4-6 months after start ussing ).
Don't use clear name for your varibles : Password or Pass or PSW .... User... Verify . In fact after finish the job is better to replace all variables and procedure names with something like LKKj,UHu,OIY.
Don't use clear messages : 'You use an unregistered software' blablabla . Crypt all.
I remember that my first softwares was with a single protection . In same week I found 3-4 on warez pages :)
When I start to use multiple protections I don't found any one there . I don't say that is imposible to crack . But is cheap to buy and not to spend couple weks to crack .
In same time some protection can be detected after couple months .
I talk to much :P
Bye !!