[x]
Posted via EE Mobile

Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again.

07/13/2009 at 09:51AM PDT, ID: 24565979
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

7.9

Winsock Recv/Send problem

Asked by ProjectZIG in Winsock, Signal Processing, C++ Builder

Tags: Winsock, C++, C, API, Recv

I've been having one hell of a problem with a program I'm making.  Basically, it's inter-process communication using sockets. I've done sockets for years, and just recently started running into this roadblock that I can't figure out.  I've gotten it to connect to the "server" (which is just another program running a bind on 127.0.0.1), but when we exchange information, I've used a set of MessageBox's to show me the data going between the two.  The MessageBox's hault program execution until user input, but from what I understand, messages are supposed to queue up, right? Anyways, this is what I'm getting (an example conversation):

-Connect to localhost-
server SEND: 0,CONNECTED
client RECV: 0,CONNECTED_TO_SERVER

client SEND: 1,COMMAND,1,ARGS,HERE
server RECV: 1,COMMAND,1,ARGS,HERE

server SEND: 2,FLUSH
client RECV: 2,FLUSHCTED_TO_SERVER

-----

You'll notice that my client is recv'ing but it almost looks like the buffer/recv queue I'm using isn't being flushed properly and it has remnants of previous packets in it.

Maybe it has something to do with my methodology? I'm using a while() loop on a non-blocking socket inside of a different thread in my GUI, and skipping past anything with a WSAEWOULDBLOCK error to recieve everything.  I hope the experts aren't laughing at me at this point :P

Here's the strange part...I'm doing EVERYTHING I can to zero this buffer out though..during every loop iteration, I set my buffer's 0 index to 0x00 like so:
recvBuff[0] = 0x00;
Which should set the string to null (just to make sure I'm not overwiting what I had)..from the server side, I used a MessageBox to show me what the server was sending, and it IS sending properly formatted packets, so I know the problem is on my client end...I even tried taking the recvBuff upon a successful recv call and doing a strncpy into a NEW buffer based on the size of data receieved like so:

lResult = recv(socket,recvBuff,512,0);
if(lResult > 0)
{
   strncpy(buff2,recvBuff,lResult);
  ..etc..
}

It probably has a whole lot to do with my loop, but I can't for the LIFE of me figure out why my buffer isn't clearing/why my socket recv data is all mashing together.

OH I FORGOT -- If I put a message box after the recv call showing the AMOUNT of data I received like so:

sprintf(buffer,"%i -- Number of bytes recvd",lResult);
MessageBox(0,buffer,"Recv",0);

Then it actually shows me the correct number AND parses correctly..but only if that message box is there. Is it a speed issue? What the hell is going on?? lol

Any help at all would be GREATLY appreciated...and if you can think of a better way to do winsock in C++ (I'm using MingW via Ultimate++), perhaps async sockets or something, PLEASE let me know. I'm about to smash my computer due to this lol :P

-Kevin
[+][-]07/14/09 05:28 AM, ID: 24848619

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]07/14/09 08:30 AM, ID: 24850672

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]07/28/09 08:29 AM, ID: 24961690

View this solution now by starting your 30-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: Winsock, Signal Processing, C++ Builder
Tags: Winsock, C++, C, API, Recv
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: BigRat
Participating Experts: 2
Solution Grade: A
 
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20090824-EE-VQP-74 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_3_20080625