Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of zillah
zillahFlag for Australia

asked on

PDM , messgae : PDM has encountered a firewall configuration

When i try to access the primary pix firewall, I am receiving this message :

http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/5623/pdmhasencounteredzi0.jpg

If I click on the "Configuration" option I would receive the same message

If I click on the "Monitoring" option I would receive the same message as well

Regards

Avatar of bugsaif
bugsaif

Stupid suggestion but, what happens if you keep hitting 'OK'... atleast 20 or so times?
Oh and have you made any changes to your PIX config lately?
Avatar of zillah

ASKER

[cut]
Oh and have you made any changes to your PIX config lately?
[/cut]
I am not sure if this will affect or not?
https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/22072536/PIX-525-and-accessing-PDM-within-LAN.html
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of rsivanandan
rsivanandan
Flag of India image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of zillah

ASKER

[cut]
no alias (dmz) 192.168.101.210 192.168.2.10 255.255.255.255
[/cut]
Will that affect the PIX configuration because I am using product device (not experimental one) ?
Regards
Yes, it affects the working of pix since you put it in there for a reason. You need to have a workaround for it.

Cheers,
Rajesh
SOLUTION
Avatar of Tim Holman
Tim Holman
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of zillah

ASKER

My curious is that : 192.168.2.10 is Primary domain Controller withing my LAN,(x.x.2.x LAN addresses)
192.168.101.210 is unpingable (timed out),,,, I could not figure out yet , if this PC still exists on our DMZ (x.x.101.x DMZ addresses) or it not ?

If I disabled alias without adding:
static (inside,dmz) 192.168.101.210 192.168.2.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 dns

Does it make any difference ?
You don't need that, since you already have the static statements in your config. I did check that.

Cheers,
Rajesh
Avatar of zillah

ASKER

[cut]
You don't need that, since you already have the static statements in your config.
[/cut]
Did you mean that I do not need to add the command below:
static (inside,dmz) 192.168.101.210 192.168.2.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 dns
Zillah,

  You already have that in your config (both ways), check your config.

Cheers,
Rajesh
Avatar of zillah

ASKER

[cut]
You already have that in your config (both ways), check your config.
[/cut]
Thanks for that, I have found that , no it is working fine.

As far as know that the format for pix static command is :

static (highSecurity, lowSecurity) lowip highip

but in the configuration that I have got  (we have got different format)!!!

Please see below :
static (dmz,inside) 192.168.2.10 192.168.101.210 dns netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
static (dmz,inside) 192.168.2.11 192.168.101.211 dns netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

Regards
They basically defines from *where* to *where*. Nat is a direction bound stuff.

So the first will be *from* and the second will be *to*

In your above example, the machine is sitting in dmz with an ip address of 192.168.101.210.

But it will look like 192.168.2.10 to all the computers that are *inside*.

Cheers,
Rajesh