A dmz would be better if you have multiple public IPs. If you just have one public IP use port forwarding and leave the server on your LAN.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsI have a crm server that i will be installing, it is not hosting an sql database. i've been told i can leave it on the LAN and just open port 443. do i want to really do that or can i put it on the dmz and do the same with a little fine tuning on access rules?
i was told the dmz would expose more than what the LAN side would expose?
Thoughts?
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
let me be more detailed in my scenario:
Pro2040 LAN: 192.168.6.1
SQL on LAN: 192.168.6.10
Pro2040 WAN: 24.5.6.2
DMZ : 24.5.6.3
NAT DMZ www server: 192.168.17.3
access rule #1: wan src: 24.5.6.3 lan dstn: 192.168.6.10 port 1433
access rule #2: wan src: * lan dstn: 192.168.17.3 port 443
in this scenario the www server is on the dmz, if compromised the lan is safe.
external users land on dmz server, transactions take place using access rule #1.
would this configuration work and is it better than having a device on the lan and opening port 443?
i think it's my misunderstanding how dmz works, are devices on the dmz still behind the firewall?
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: mudmanc4Posted on 2009-08-12 at 07:57:53ID: 25079382
Personally I would never use the DMZ, like you stated, you open up way too much . Opening the specific ports that you need is much safer then exposing the entire machine. I would set a static IP to the machine, open only the ports that must be open, and forward them to the static IP you set for that machine, forward port 80 to 80 on that IP.(keeps them out of the router, and directs them to the server) That would be the basics of the basics to get you going.