Seriously, get to 6.3(5) first.
Cheers,
rsivanandan
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsWe have a Cisco Pix with Version 6.0(2) for our firewall. We were advised that port 5060 for sip is not working from our vendor. Below is the Code, all ports are open. I dont see whats being blocked.
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: kenboonejrPosted on 2009-09-16 at 17:03:31ID: 25351614
Here are a couple of things to try:
/products/ hw/vpndevc /ps2030/ pr oducts_con figuration _example09 186a00801f c74a.shtml
Add this:
fixup protocol sip udp 5060
Also, you are running a really old version of pix software. I would at least upgrade to 6.3(5).
Here is a document that might help you with troubleshooting this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US
Also not the comments about what version of code support NAT but not PAT. If though you are using a static command, the fact that you are translating based on ports might make this fall under the category of PAT, which isn't supported until you get to version 6.2.
Hope that helps.