>I'm not sure if it's a subnet mismatch or what...I'm being told to NAT to a /32 address
What addresses do you need to nat to a single IP? What IP do you need to nat them to?
Agree with above that the ACL 100 is the problem.
>crypto map mymap 1 match address 100
This defines the traffic to get encrypted, and must match exactly a mirror image on their end. You cannot have it structured the way you do. It must be simple permit source network - destination network.
simplify to
access-list 100 permit ip 10.20.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.60.0 255.255.255.0
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: bignewfPosted on 2009-11-08 at 03:44:03ID: 25770175
without the config from peer 20.20.20.20, it is more difficult to diagnose as we need to know ISAKMPand IKE policies on peer and a sh crypto isakmp, debug crypto isakmp from the peer (and from yours)
These are not needed:
no access-list 100 permit ip host 10.20.20.1 host 192.168.60.20
no access-list 100 permit ip host 10.20.20.1 host 192.168.60.25
no access-list 100 permit ip host 10.20.20.1 host 192.168.60.26
as you have this:access-list 100 permit ip 10.20.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.60.0 255.255.255.0 (allows all ip traffic to each subnet in this access list, so above access lists are redundant)
mismatch in above will cause phase 2 failure
try to get config from opposing peer