Something like this:
static (inside,outside) 216.16.243.178 192.168.1.198 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
Of course I'm getting conflicts because of the PAT system in place now. I'm hesitant to rip out all the PAT rules to try this new approach when I'm not entirely convinced my external IP block is functional. I've changed the DNS entry for my OWA website, and I can't connect on any IP except 216.16.243.178 (the beginning of my range).
Does it matter if I specify "outside interface IP" vs. explicitly defining an IP in that range? 216.16.243.180 should be within the 216.16.243.178/29 range, right? Why does this work?
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: MikeKanePosted on 2009-11-03 at 07:01:29ID: 25729550
As it stands, you have a bunch of statics that do the port forwarding. I'd like to see the code that you tried for the 1 to 1 statics....
Usually, all you need, are the following:
static (inside,outside) <outside ip> <inside ip> netmask <sm Mask>
access-list outside-in extended permit ip any <outside ip>
access-group outside-in in interface outside