Advertisement

06.12.2006 at 11:30PM PDT, ID: 21884211
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

7.4

PIX v7 - fragmentation & MTU's

Asked by td_miles in Network Software Firewalls, Enterprise Firewalls, Cisco PIX Firewall

Tags: , ,

Hi all,

I have a situation where I have upgraded one of our PIX to 7.0.4 (from 6.3.5) and a few things have broken. The layout of the PIX looks like this:

home PIX --VPN-- support PIX ---LAN--- main PIX ---VPN--- store PIX

So there are FOUR PIX firewalls in use:

home PIX - PIX 501 v6.3.5, used to allow the support personel remote access to the corporate LAN and the store PC's.
support PIX - PIX 501 v6.3.5, used to get around the earlier issue with PIX that traffic coming in one VPN tunnel couldn't be routed back out of the same interface to another tunnel.
main PIX - PIX 515E v7.0.4, all of the stores (140 of them) have a VPN tunnel to this PIX.
store PIX - PIC 501 v6.3.1-6.3.5 (varies)

So for a support person to get remote access to a store PC the packets travels across VPN to the main office via an IPSec tunnel between home PIX & support PIX, across the LAN between support PIX & main PIX and then across IPSec tunnel between main PIX and store PIX before finally getting to store PC.

(hope this all makes sense)

The problem I have is that after upgrading the main PIX to 7.0.4 certain things don't work for the support people at home. The most notable being windows file browsing/transfer and PcAnywhere connections lockup after only a few seconds (they connect most of the time). Prior to the upgrade on the main PIX everything was working flawlessly for over 2 years now.

From past experience the problems I am seeing sometimes point to MTU/fragmentation issues.

My question is what does the 7.0.4 code do (or not do) that the 6.3.5 does ?

From the "sho run all" output (7.0.4), the following lines look interesting:

crypto ipsec fragmentation before-encryption outside
crypto ipsec fragmentation before-encryption inside
crypto ipsec df-bit copy-df outside
crypto ipsec df-bit copy-df inside

I've looked in the command reference, but the description is very basic in that it is simply a description and doesn't really explain to much what the commands DO.

Can anyone make any suggestions on what the problem might be. Rverting back to 6.3.5 is NOT an option.

I have logged a case with TAC, but is it just me or does anyone else find them increasingly less useful in that they don't seem to have good product knowledge anymore. Especially with the v7 OS. The problem is clearly related to something that has changed in the upgrade, so I would expect they might be focussing on what has changed, but most of the support people don't really seem to have any knowledge of the v7 OS and it's changes. I'm turning to EE in the hope that I might get a quicker resoution here. Thanks.Start Free Trial
 
 
[+][-]06.12.2006 at 11:49PM PDT, ID: 16891997

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]06.13.2006 at 01:28PM PDT, ID: 16897588

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]06.13.2006 at 02:39PM PDT, ID: 16898038

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]06.13.2006 at 10:40PM PDT, ID: 16900003

Experts Exchange has a courteous staff of administrators who help members get the most out of the website by means of administrative comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Administrative Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]06.19.2006 at 12:24AM PDT, ID: 16932477

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: Network Software Firewalls, Enterprise Firewalls, Cisco PIX Firewall
Tags: ipsec, pix, fragmentation
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: Netminder
Participating Experts: 2
Solution Grade: B
 
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32 - Hierarchy