Maybe I'm not reading it right, but I think you already have the nat turned off when you said
nat (outside) 0 WirelessLan 255.255.255.0 outside 0 0
static (inside,outside) InternalSubnet1 InternalSubnet1 netmask 255.255.255.0 0 0
But why do you have this line?
static (outside,inside) accessPoint accessPoint netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
and like lrmoore said, check for this line on your 515
nat (inside) 1 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
And as a side note, (or you could call it idea 2)
Our wireless lan is only used by about 10 people, and for max security I also put a pix 501 in line like you did, but instead of worring about nat and ACL's I setup VPN and loaded the VPN client on the laptop's that needed wireless access. Now I use 3des VPN encryption and leave the wireless (WPA, or WEP) turned off and I don't worry about people who claim they can crack wireless encryption.
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: lrmoorePosted on 2007-03-22 at 15:17:20ID: 18775388
This is what I would do...
Don't nat between wireless and inside.
static (inside,outside) 100.100.100.0 100.100.100.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
Create the acls to allow local ports, then deny all other ports, then allow traffic to any
object-group network InternalServers
<use actual 100.100.100.x ip addresses of servers>
access-list outside_in permit udp object-group WirelessLan object-group InternalServers object-group WebAccessTCP
<etc>
access-list outside_in deny ip object-group WirelessLan 100.100.100.0 255.255.255.0
access-list outside_in permit tcp object-group WirelessLan any eq http
access-list outside_in permit tcp object-group WirelessLan any eq https
Now, on the PIX515 firewall, be sure to allow the wirelessLan 10.1.1.0 through with a nat (inside) statement