Advertisement

07.18.2008 at 12:37PM PDT, ID: 23577986
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

9.1

Is it truly dangerous to re-enable the Windows Messenger Service that is turned off by Win XP SP-2?

Asked by wdabbs in Networking Security Vulnerabilities, Windows Networking

Tags: , ,

I know how to enable the service for our network, but I want to know if it's still "dangerous" from a security perspective. We're on a LAN protected by hardware firewalls and we only want to use the service internally for those times when someone's IM program of choice is not logged in or out of commission at the moment. It's times like those when "NET SEND" comes in handy. However, I have to remotely manage the target's services, enable the service on both machines, use the service, then disable the service on both machines. WAY too many steps. I'd like to keep the service turned on permanently but don't want to do it if it's a security risk. Most of the articles I find about the issue were written back in 2003 about an exploit that made a news splash. Is it really a vulnerability on a secured LAN in the year 2008 with updated machines?Start Free Trial
 
 
[+][-]07.18.2008 at 12:42PM PDT, ID: 22039097

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]07.18.2008 at 12:45PM PDT, ID: 22039133

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]07.18.2008 at 12:54PM PDT, ID: 22039213

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]07.18.2008 at 12:55PM PDT, ID: 22039226

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: Networking Security Vulnerabilities, Windows Networking
Tags: Microsoft, Windows XP, 2003 SBS, Services, Security
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: tigermatt
Participating Experts: 3
Solution Grade: A
 
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32 / EE_QW_2_20070628