u can refer to this site and enter the port number and see whether it is open or not
http://www.canyouseeme.org
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsI have a security division denying me access to a network because they say that it is a security risk. I dont believe it is. Can anyone tell me if there is a security risk in this scenario?
I have a management server that runs on a public IP address. Agents are installed on the computers being managed that initiate a connection with the management server. So I only need 1 port to be opened to only my 1 public IP address and it only needs to be opened for outgoing traffic not incoming.
However thier security department is telling me that this is a security risk. They are saying that this opens up their network to attacks. They are fully satisfied that our management server is not a risk, but their security guy is saying that somehow this one port opened for outgoing traffic to my one IP address can be exploited. He cited social engineering as a possible way to gain access.
Now I am not a security expert, but I do not see how someone could exploit this. It is secure communication going out under a unique protocol. It is limited to only outgoing out over one port and only to one IP address. I dont think that this security guy knows what he is talking about, he seems to be more of a big picture guy and subs out to more technical people.
Am I wrong in thinking that this does not open any vulnerabilities?
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
u can refer to this site and enter the port number and see whether it is open or not
http://www.canyouseeme.org
Let me get this straight.
The agents run on machines in their network and initiate connections to your management server.
You want them to allow outbound connections to port 5XXX for those machines.
They don't want to.
Is that right?
Allowing an additional outbound port does not open an avenue for attack from the outside simply because it only allow connections initiated from the inside. What they may be unhappy to do is allow another way for internal machines to contact the outside. They may have their network locked down so that their users can browse the web and not much else (such as denying file-sharing traffic) and they may not want to loosen that arrangement.
They may also be worried about attackers exploiting other vulnerabilities and delivering payloads into their network that can then use port 5XXX to exfiltrate data or connect back to the attackers machine to allow remote control.
If the firewall was set to allow outgoing connections to only port 5XXX or your management IP then all of these considerations are dealt with and I can't really see why else they would object.
Assuming they do allow outbound connections to some port then perhaps you could determine which ports they are (a good bet would be 80 http and 443 https) and configure your agents to connect to one of those and your management server to accept incoming connections to the same.
At the least, I think you need to get something in writing detailing their concerns so that you can properly address those concerns.
They need to take care of an issue on their end. They have a administration network and a production network that are not seperated. They need to configure their firewall to prevent any posibilities of problems in production. I undertand this concern, but at the same time they are preventing me from rolling out patches, doing backups, and other management tasks. The problem is that the person approving this in their security department, is not a very technical person. He is telling me that this would open up social engineering attacks, and has no idea what he is saying. With a unique encrypted protocol running on one IP address and only having outgoing access, I would say that the risk is jsut about as minimal as you can get, short of cutting the WAN cable.
Thanks for the help, just wanted to make sure that I wasn't going crazy.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: pankusareenPosted on 2009-08-27 at 07:05:27ID: 25198296
Yes there are some ports if opened can be exploited like DCOM RPC (port 135) can be exploit . RPC Locator (port 445) can also be exploited.
U just use a good firewall and block that port number that use security division say