The funding company requires proof that compilable source code is under his control. Then they will the provide funding. I trust this person, but then again he is very ill.
What I don't trust is what will happen to the source code if he is unable to manage the situation.
I was simply looking for a way (changing variable names, method names, namespace names, etc) to make the logic a bit more difficult to follow.
However, it is not just a simple matter of making global replaces. A smart agent of some sort (something that understands code organization) is required. Otherwise, problems arise.
Hopefully that clears things up.
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: purplepomegranitePosted on 2008-07-16 at 16:38:38ID: 22021164
Why would he need compilable source code? Surely he would just need object code... i.e. the compiled code. This should prove concept and that a product was there. What you are asking is almost impossible - the point in source code is that it is that. If you obfuscate it, the compiler doesn't understand it, it needs to be unobfuscated to compile. So unless someone writes a compiler with built in de-obfuscation, you can't do it.
Build the app and pass that to him. It should be all he needs. I'd be distrustful otherwise without very good reasons, and if the reasons were good enough, I'd expect to be there with the source code, not just hand it over...