It depends very much on the email service subscribed to. As b0lsc0tt says, there is often a Catchall to funnel everything down the pipe to a designated user, but this is not obilgatory. Many systems now take the policy that anything that is not properly addressed is trashed. As b0lsc0tt says, rejection is better than trashing. One company I dealt with recently refused point blank to set up one Catchall mailbox for anything coming in - anything improperly addressed was trashed and not rejected to sender. I recommended to the client he move to a different email provider that did provide this Catchall facility.
My recommendation to you is to host your own email server, and to have direct SMTP delivery inbound. It will mean a bit more work, but at least you will be in control.
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: b0lsc0ttPosted on 2006-04-07 at 10:35:17ID: 16402554
DB12,
The question would be for HP. Catchall is common and may be in use but it gets directed to one email address. Those messages may still be deleted automatically or sit and never be read. Since it doesn't seem like the customer got a reject and if no one in the company is managing or getting the catchall emails then it may be best to have HP discontinue it. I think getting an email reject is better than not having anyone ever look at it.
HP will be the only ones that can help with the details or changing this.
b0lsc0tt