Advertisement

08.28.2008 at 12:59AM PDT, ID: 23684633
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

8.4

SMTP virtual server. Stoping spam before its processed in 2000?

Asked by fregan32 in Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), Exchange Email Server, Message Queue

Tags: , , ,

Hello,

I have recently inherited a network consisting of a 2000 DC with Exchange 2000 running on it. The poor machine is starting to show its age but untill my new hardware arrives it will have to  hold together.
The problem is mail flow has almost stoped with queues of a ridiculus length, when investigated two problems seem apparent:
1. 1706 1707 MSExchangetransport pop up every ten minutes in the application log with diagnostic logging enabled.
2. The SMTP logs show about 80, 000 of the following entries per 12 hour period.
2008-08-27 01:11:01 116.24.225.172 ertert SMTPSVC1 myserver 10.6.0.11 0 EHLO 250 SMTP -
2008-08-27 01:11:04 116.24.225.172 ertert SMTPSVC1 myserver 10.6.0.11 0 RCPT 550 SMTP -
2008-08-27 01:11:04 116.24.225.172 ertert SMTPSVC1 myserver 10.6.0.11 0 RCPT 550 SMTP -
2008-08-27 01:11:04 116.24.225.172 ertert SMTPSVC1 myserver 10.6.0.11 0 DATA 554 SMTP -
2008-08-27 01:11:05 116.24.225.172 ertert SMTPSVC1 myserver 10.6.0.11 0 MAIL 250 SMTP -
2008-08-27 01:11:06 116.24.225.172 ertert SMTPSVC1 myserver 10.6.0.11 0 QUIT 240 SMTP -

Now im assuming because i am getting 550 and 554 that i am not relaying these on.
A good proportion seem to be coming from multiple IP addresses with the same cs-username.

For:
1. I will try to do an offline integrity check of the database.
2. ?? is there any way i can stop these from reaching the smtp virtual server with exchange 2000? I dont really want to buy any new software/hardware as in 4 weeks i will get 4 new Win 2003 servers and two Exchange 2007 licences.

Also would 80000 of these smpt connections slow down my machines ability to move messages (celeron 1700 dont laugh its not funny) or should i be looking into other avenues?

Any ideas or avenues of interest will be greatly appreciated and please dont feel afraid to shoot me down if i have made any glaring mistakes in my logical thinking. Start Free Trial
 
Keywords: SMTP virtual server. Stoping spam be…
 
Loading Advertisement...
 
[+][-]08.28.2008 at 06:33AM PDT, ID: 22334548

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.28.2008 at 04:02PM PDT, ID: 22340779

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.29.2008 at 01:33AM PDT, ID: 22343389

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), Exchange Email Server, Message Queue
Tags: MIcrosoft, Exchange, 2000, Installed on an underpowered DC
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: Chris-Dent
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: B
 
 
[+][-]08.29.2008 at 07:31AM PDT, ID: 22345745

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]09.01.2008 at 05:50PM PDT, ID: 22363541

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]09.02.2008 at 01:31AM PDT, ID: 22365131

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32 / EE_QW_2_20070628