Advertisement

05.06.2008 at 02:06PM PDT, ID: 23380950
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

7.4

Configuring NIC teams / port groups on a Cisco Catalyst 2960

Asked by lunanat in Network Design & Methodology, Network Switches & Hubs

Tags: , ,

I have some new servers, which have NICs in them capable of load balancing... unfortunately, I am fairly new to this topic.  I've read through the documentation, however I seem to be running into problems.

Assuming I am starting from a default configuration, and that my group is on interfaces gigE 0/9 - 12, what steps would I need to take to cause the ports to load balance?

Right now I have all 4 hooked up and my syslog is getting dozens of errors that the mac address is switching between those ports quite rapidly.. which makes sense if one is configured for load balancing and the other is not.

The end goal is to get 4gbps (theoretical limit, of course) of speed between the switch and the server.Start Free Trial
 
 
[+][-]05.06.2008 at 02:46PM PDT, ID: 21511343

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: Network Design & Methodology, Network Switches & Hubs
Tags: Cisco, Catalyst 2690, 12.2
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: dylan_leggatt
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: B
 
 
[+][-]05.07.2008 at 07:43AM PDT, ID: 21516948

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]05.07.2008 at 02:04PM PDT, ID: 21520347

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32 / EE_QW_2_20070628