thanks for your help.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsI want to configure our JBOSS application server (AS) with active/active or load balanced clustering (Clustering = Load Balancing + failover + session replication). Our web programmers want to configure JBOSS as an active/passive cluster...so only 1 web server is online and working at a time.
My question - why would the web programmers want active/passive over my full clustering idea? I need ammo to shoot their idea down, good hard facts with sources. I need all the cons to why their active/passive idea is rubbish and pros to make my idea shine. I have been searching online for about a week so far and cannot find any good hard factual data with sources.
also, is there any tools that i can plan how much load our server can take? to prove we could use 2 servers simultaneously to handle our workload. thanks.
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: mrjoltcolaPosted on 2009-09-09 at 13:17:58ID: 25295167
Considering that none of the JBoss Clustering guides even discuss an active-standby cluster, the request of your programmers is atypical.
Have your programmers justified why they want active-standby? That is usually not something the app programmers are concerned with, unless there is some specific reason / bug / feature that does not cluster properly. You should be able to deploy the app according to scalability / uptime requirements that may change after the app is written.
An idle standby node is a waste of resources and will result in less overall capacity. If you are the sys-admin, clarify your role, and make it clear that your job is to deploy and manage that deployment. Their job is to write the app. Your recommendation is for active-active, so there is no downtime, and because it is the standard JBoss clustering approach. It has the advantage of seamless failover / recovery of services, whereas with an active-passive, there will be downtime while the standby is started, plus sessions will not failover.
I cannot claim to be a JBoss expert, but the only clusters I _have_ run were active-active load-balancing. The only ammo I know to give is to refer to the JBoss clustering guide, and note that the recommended configs are all active nodes.