Hall of Fame

1. objects27,840
2. CEHJ7,800
3. HonorGod6,250
4. mwvisa14,000
5. Kuldeepc...3,500
6. leakim9712,800
7. yuzh2,500
7. gheist2,500
7. arevuri2,500
10. anilallewar2,400
11. Gns2,000
11. jim_cakalic2,000
11. rajesh_b...2,000
11. knight002,000
11. jamoville2,000
11. sciuriware2,000
11. Venabili2,000
11. ramazany...2,000
11. a_b2,000
11. MuraliKanth2,000
11. mwecom...2,000
11. Nellios2,000
11. momi_sa...2,000
11. 60MXG2,000
11. Paranorm...2,000
11. darkapple2,000
11. bluebelldis...2,000
11. crossdev2,000
11. Tuno852,000
11. NicoJuicy2,000
11. tdlewis2,000

1. objects34,740
2. CEHJ17,800
3. HonorGod17,115
4. girionis8,250
5. ramazany...7,672
6. jim_cakalic5,200
6. bluebelldis...5,200
8. yuzh5,000
8. mayankea...5,000
10. Bart_Cr4,500
11. J4M3S_...4,000
11. mwvisa14,000
11. momi_sa...4,000
14. jamoville3,500
14. ksivananth3,500
14. Kuldeepc...3,500
17. n_sachin13,425
18. sciuriware3,200
19. dejanpazin3,000
19. Nellios3,000
21. contactka...2,900
22. leakim9712,800
23. rajesh_b...2,750
23. tvedtem2,750
25. Ajay-Singh2,650

	[x] Posted via EE Mobile
	Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again.

Question

	[x] Attachment Details

[x]

The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

The Grade of the Solution
The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
The Number of Author and Expert Comments
The Number of Experts Contributing
The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

8.1

CLOSE_WAIT issue with java.net sockets

Asked by isreenivas in Java Application Servers, WebApplications, Java Programming Language

Tags: Java

We are facing CLOSE_WAIT issue when we use java.net socket and ServerSocket. The CLOSE_WAIT ports are keep on increasing when we run the application. We made couple of changes i.e adding setSoTimeout() and setSoLinger() methods to the code, but no use. I have seen in one of thread in your site, adding TcpTimedWaitDelay to tcpip registry may solve the issue. But microsoft claims this registry entry only TIME_WAIT sockets, not CLOSE_WAIT. I have also attached snippet of code i.e daemon, manager and client file.

View the Solution FREE for 30 Days

Attachments:

CLOSE-WAITProblem.txt (5 KB) (File Type Details)

daemon, manager and client code snippet

20091021-EE-VQP-81 / EE_QW_2_20070628

CLOSE_WAIT issue with java.net sockets

Asked by isreenivas in Java Application Servers, WebApplications, Java Programming Language

Tags: Java

About this solution