We are looking for a complete IBM SAN replacement for our PACS system.
Currently we have two X336 IBM servers connected via fiber channel to a inline corp brand SAN, with 16 X 300gb SAS Drives. ( all with a expiring warranty, and the array company has just sold to another company )
However, with our current image usage, we were quoted at needing 6-9 TB's of storage in 5-7 years.
Therefore, I need a scalable system, with a fairly low starting cost, but huge upgrade potential.
I was looking at the IBM BladeCenter S Chassis.
It supports up to 3.6 TB of SAS drives with modules, per chassis. Can you team more than one Chassis to make a single large partition? 3.6 TB X 2 or X 3.
This would also let us add servers as needed for the future.
If so, that would give us room for now, and we could always add the DS4000 series of SAN. But the DS4200 series of SAN, with a maxed SAS configuration is quite expensive.
OR
Are there other options that are worth looking at from IBM?
An ideal system, would be something that we could start out with about 4-6 TB of SAS drives, and could move up to 10-15 TB if needed. With something like scalable partitioning, and raid for redundancy.
This system will only be used for our PACS, and we will use our existing SAN for departmental and house wide use.
The software vendor would prefer us to use IBM systems
Look into iSCSI. The performance is right up there with fibre channel disks, but the cost is a lot less and you can add to the system as you need to, the drives are redundant and you have the option to make the entire try of disks redundant, another added benefit is all the tools like SAN copy for replication are usually included in the price. It is well worth investigating.
Wouldn't it be nice if they were to bring out a SAS RAID controller to put into an I/O slot on the Bladecenter S rather than the current SAS expander that splits off whole disks to individual servers? Then you might be able to hang an external SAS shelf off it with 12 or so more disks in it. I wonder if IBM have thought of that...