[x]
Posted via EE Mobile

Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again.

Question
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

8.2

TLS and SMTP Bridgehead Server not working right

Asked by jhyiesla in Exchange Email Server, Email Protocols, Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)

I have an Exchange 2003 environment.  I have several routing group connectors set up to handle various connections. One is designed just for sending email to the Internet. The others are for connections to partner email servers.  All use the same SMTP Virtual Server.

I want to implement TLS to our email filtering service. I have had TLS working on outgoing emails for almost a year since the outgoing is controlled by the connector and TLS is set on the connector.  Our partners do not support TLS.  Now I wish to implement TLS incoming from the email filtering service.

Here's what I have done.  I have created a second SMTP Virtual Server and I have checked in the Authentication area for it to use TLS. I have applied our SSL cert to the VS as well. I then went to the routing group connector for the Internet email connection and I removed the Default SMTP VS and added in the new one. I then bounced both SMTP VS's.  Initially I still saw outgoing email being processed through the old VS. I reinstalled the old VS into the connector, waited for the email to clear and then removed it once again, bouncing the SMTP VS's between each change. Finally I saw outgoing emails being processed through the new SMTP VS.

Then we started our testing by enabling TLS on the email filtering service.  This failed. We could see TLS activity in Wireshark, but for whatever reason, it wasn't being processed into the mailbox. So we played around with it  and never figured that out. Anyway, we set the email filtering service back to a setting where TLS was preferred, but could send it by SMTP.  Then we started getting in emails via just plain old SMTP.  .  

Now, if I have the connector pointed to the SMTP VS that is set only to do TLS, how are we getting in regular SMTP emails?  

Subsequently we decided to just leave it for now and work on it later.  We found then that we could no longer process outgoing emails.  I checked the queues in the Exchange server and could see that outgoing emails were queued on the old SMTP VS, which is NOT any longer specified in the connector as the one to use.  I added back in the old VS so that both are in the connector and now emails are going both directions again.  Incoming TLS still doesn't work, but whatever...

So a second question is how are outgoing emails falling into the old VS when only the new one was specified in the connector?  Is there some other service that I should have bounced?  At one point we did bounce the SMTP Service.  I really don't want to reboot the entire server.  Any thoughts are appreciated.
[+][-]09/10/09 02:09 PM, ID: 25304384Expert Comment

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]09/10/09 07:50 PM, ID: 25306397Author Comment

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]09/11/09 01:53 AM, ID: 25307636Expert Comment

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]09/11/09 06:13 AM, ID: 25309009Author Comment

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]09/11/09 10:24 AM, ID: 25311617Accepted Solution

View this solution now by starting your 30-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

About this solution

Zones: Exchange Email Server, Email Protocols, Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: Mestha
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: B
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20091021-EE-VQP-81 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_3_20080625