You can, by defining individual host routes, as long as there are no duplicate addresses on both networks which you have to access. As more specific routes have precedence over the generous ones, you can modify the routing behaviour, and force some addresses to go local while others are remote. But I would not recommend that - very tricky and delicate.
And I can't remember about the NSR / SafeNet VPN client allowing for (virtual) network interfaces (which you would need for routing) or defining VPN rules on the client (which would be the alternate way). I know the NSR is keen to isolate you from you local network if you have the same IP addresses.
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: bignewfPosted on 2009-01-04 at 05:29:56ID: 23289631
This is why you cannot access resources on an internal lan behind a firewall. If the remote client is on the same subnet i.e in a home network, which most normally have an ip of 192.168.1.X and the remote lan is the same subnet, routing cannot occur from the remote client network to the internal lan behind the firewall. Most home routers allow you to change the internal ip of the router, so the best method is to make this ip say 192.168.50.X (or anything as long as the octet is different than the network behind the firewall.
Then the remote client will get an ip range from dhcp scope in the remote router and you will then be able to access hosts behind the firewall on the internal lan