Iin order to get a successful full system restore in Windows you need to have your server patched exactly (service pack, patches, etc) at the same level that it was before. My experience with Commvault is that even in this case you might no be able to complete the restore succesfully.
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: Psy053Posted on 2009-09-07 at 23:45:38ID: 25279141
Realistically, the only way to ensure full system recoverability, is to perform a full system backup.
I am sure that it is possible to successfully recover a server with only the System State Backup, however there is always potential that something critical to the operation of that server is missed in the System State Backup. In the case of your File / Print Server this could something as trivial as a missing print driver or associated object.
The following is a list of items that the System State Backups protect, however, these will change based on the role of the server:
Active Directory Databases,
SYSVOL,
System Protected Files,
IIS,
COM+ Database,
Event Logs,
One Touch Files,
Certificate Services,
RSM,
Terminal Services Licensing,
Disk Quotas,
Content Indexing Catalogs,
WMI Database,
DHCP,
WINS,
UDDI Database,
Remote Storage Database,
Certificate Services,
and related Commvault data
The best way to see what your System State Backups are protecting is to "view backup items" for the particular server.
It is possible to reduce the size of your backup by filtering out folders and the like, but a lot of this will come with trial and error. Personally, I think you would be better of looking into creating an additional subclient which you could use to capture all of the system data not covered in the system state and user data backups. You could then schedule the backup to occur less frequently, and even point the subclient to a new Storage Policy that is setup with less retention than required for your user data.