Thanks for the comment. I'm now at 89% of the full format and would like to see how the drive looks when the format is done before I accept the solution and close the question. BTW, I'm going to dig out one of those external eSATA posts from my parts heap and hook the drive up as an SATA drive later. Don't know why I didn't think of that to begin with but I had no idea that the USB format would take so long. I'm glad to learn the difference between a full format and a quick format. I thought in some way the full format was better and less flaky than the quick format.
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: leewPosted on 2009-09-23 at 04:31:02ID: 25401874
You did a "full format" instead of a quick format, didn't you? A Full Format merely runs a check on the sectors in the same way chkdsk does... on a new drive, there's little point in running a full format. And you connected it via USB (which is slower on many levels than eSATA and even slower than Firewire (sustained, firewire is faster, burst, USB COULD be faster; the SPECs claim USB is faster, but it just isn't in real world tests)). 24 hours to get to 86% does seem a bit slower than I'd expect... but since you're connected via USB... I wouldn't worry about it. If you connected via eSATA and it took that long, THEN I'd worry.