It is not because it is not there anymore - I need to replace the file.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsMy computer had a virus, I used combofix and scanned in safemode with 3 scanners and now the virus is gone. My windows XP is a little damaged afterwards. I am trying to uninstall the "Vista Transformation Pack" that gave me the virus in the first place. To uninstall it however, it says it can't find a valid scrnrdr.exe file in the WINDOWS/system32 folder. I put in my XP cd and I can't find it on there. Any suggestions in how I can replace this file?
-Jeff
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
try the revo uninstaller : http://www.revouninstaller
jeffiepoo wrote: "It is not because it is not there anymore - I need to replace the file."
No, you don't, because, as...
skywalker39 wrote: "scrnrdr.exe is the virus."
What you now need to do is uninstall the "Vista Transformation Pack" (VTP), which is giving you problems because the installer is telling you that it can't run until and unless scrnrdr.exe is present. Were I wishing to inflict malware hidden within something else (in this case, that "something else" would be the VTP), I'd also make it so the VTP couldn't be uninstalled unless the underlying malware which I intended to convey was present; and I'd also leave said malware behind even after the VTP was uninstalled. Once it becomes clear to you that the author of VTP was trying to harm you, why would you, from that moment forward, trust any other part of what he deposited onto your computer... including his uninstaller?
The reason Nobus told you to use the REVO uninstaller is because REVO does a kind of interesting thing when it uninstalls. It first tries to run the software's own uninstaller; but even if that fails, REVO then goes and tries to hunt down any files, folders and registry entries left behind after the normal uninstaller runs... even if it fails. REVO is free and safe and easy to use. I, personally, use it exclusively to uninstall now (er... well... I also use the free -- and extraordinarily cool -- ZSoft uninstaller, but only when I need to use its snapshot capabilities).
You need to get VTP off your machine. Use REVO to do it.
But don't stop there. We know your machine was infected. I know you think that now it's not, but don't make that assumption. You used ComboFix, which is not for the faint-of-heart. Once VTP is off your machine, since you're not afraid to use it, I'd use it again, just for grins.
But then I'd do a manual scan with the free versions of both MALWARE BYTES and SUPERANTISPYWARE.
And then, begged is the question: Why didn't your anti-spyware catch this thing? Or are you not using any? How 'bout a firewall?
You didn't ask, but I'll tell you the suite that I now use (every bit of it free):
Comodo Internet Security (CIS) as my firewall, anti-virus and host intrusion protection (HIPS). It's firewall component is best-of-breed. It's anti-virus component is young and is only now finally getting to the point where it's as good as (or maybe slowly becoming better than) AVG's free anti-virus product. Its HIPS component is a pain-in-the-rear at first because it pops-up so much... until it's finally trained, that is. Once you know how to use it, and it has finally learned your machine, you'd be amazed what it catches. The three of them, together, create an impenetrable fortress that's amazing... especially considering that the darned thing is free. Yes, Comodo has its critics in such as the Wilder Security Forums... but if you look close, a lot of that is coming from the makers (and/or their supporters) of commercial products which aren't really much better than Comodo, and who realize that if Comodo ever catches on, they'll lose money hand-over-fist.
Spybot Search & Destroy (SS&D)... not because it's a good anti-spyware product anymore... it really isn't. But it has a nice hosts file capability, and a good browser innoculation and realtime browser protectiion capability. Its tea-timer is also a terrific albeit very cryptic HIPS, but Comodo's is better, so I just leave that turned off. I almost never spyware scan with SS&D anymore because, like I said, there are other free products out there that are superior (which I'm about to mention). But I sure do use the other parts of SS&D as I've described herein. I also make sure that SS&D checks for updates every night; and I also have it auto-innoculate in the middle of the night, right after updating, twice a week.
Malware Bytes (MB) - This thing is amazing. There's no other way to put it. It find almost everything, and what it doesn't fine, the one I'm about to name will find (and vice versa). The freeware version won't do realtime scanning, so I just manually update it and scan with it weekly. Simple as that. I also occasionally scan individual suspicious files with it by right-single-clicking on them in Windows Explorer, and then selecting Malware Bytes to scan them.
SuperAntiSpyware (SAS) - This thing is amazing.... same as Malware Bytes. What one misses, the other finds. The freeware version won't do realtime scanning, so I just do weekly manual scanning, just like Malware Bytes. I do, though, let SAS load with Windows and sit in the system tray, not because it can do realtime scanning, but because by so doing, it will auto-update periodically, and also by having it in the system tray it also shows-up on the right-click context menu so I can manually scan individual files with it. But here's the coolest thing about having it in the system tray: It will watch for changes to my browser's home page (the changing of which is a common malware tactic). I used to use Spyware Guard (SG) for that, but it hasn't been updated since 2004... and as long as SAS will do that function, and is in my system tray anyway, I stopped using SG.
Spyware Blaster (SB) - This isn't really an anti-spyware or anti-virus product in the same sense as the others. It's a browser innoculator... a lot like that particular function ins SS&D... except that compared with SS&D, it's on steroids. It doesn't do realtime scanning... or any scanning for that matter. It just innoculates... and better than anything else out there! The free vrsion won't auto-update, so one has to remember to periodically update and then do a manual innoculation. I do it maybe twice a month.
And that's pretty much it. It's a killer combination, I tell you. *NOTHING* gets through. Nothing. And it doesnn't cost me a cent (though, as earlier mentioned, there is a trick to properly using CIS... but once trained and learned, it's the best!).
I used to also use a-Squared-Free (a2Free) as a periodic manual scanner... that is, until I read a couple of articles by guys who did thorough head-to-head testing of all of these products using a fresh installation of Vista fand a CD with 50 known exploits on it for each test. To my surprise (and to the surprise of the testers, too) a2Free ended-up being only one notch above completely useless against about 90% of them.... kinda' like what has happened with the venerable SS&D of late. So I uninstalled a2Free. In those same tests, either MB or SAS found nearly all; and together they found 100%. CIS also found 100%, but, like I said, it's through a combination of its three components... the HIPS part of which takes some both learning and getting used to.
So those are my recommendations... for whatever it's worth.
Well, only Comodo Internet Security (CIS) is running constantly.... er... well... SuperAntiSpyware (SAS), too, but only for purposes of notifying when something tries to change the browser home page. Remember that everything else is either periodic or innoculation based.
Spybot Search & Destroy (SS&D), for example, isn't running its HIPS (TeaTimer) which would, if it were running, be a "realtime" thing. The other monitoring that SS&D does is a misnomer... not really realtime. The "hosts" file is really a Windows thing. SS&D just provides the entries to the hosts file. And the realtime browser monitoring is really just based on the innoculation. There isn't a realtime browser monitor piece of software running.
Spyware Blaster (SB)... same thing. It's just an innoculation. Launch it, let it update, innoculate, then close it. Done. Nothing running in the background.
Even SAS sitting in the system tray is only running a tiny little utility that monitors how long it's been since a spyware database update (and then notifies if it's been too long); and then watches the one and only registry entry where the browser homepage is controlled. Nothing else. No big realtime scanner utility running. Same with Malware Bytes (MB). It has a right-click context menu item, but that doesn't mean it's running. It's just a periodic scanner, like SAS.
Even SS&D's nightly updates and twice-weekly auto-innoculations aren't as a consequence of SS&D running in the background and then launching itself on scheduler. Rather, SS&D (to its credit) uses the Windows Task Scheduler... which is always running in the background, no matter what. So, since I'm not running SS&D's TeaTimer, no part of it is sitting in memory, slowing things down.
I've actuallyl given all this lots of thought... making sure that there's no overlap of tasks; and trying to make as little of it as possible running all the time... for precisely the reason you suggest. The whole reason, for example, that I stopped using Spyware Guard (SG) to notify me if the browser homepage changed was because SAS performed that same task. Since I wanted SAS on the right-click menu (which meant it needed to be sitting in the system tray), I dumped SG and let SAS take over what SG used to do. (And that's after being a loyal SG user for... well... since back in the 90s. SG has been in my system tray through something like a half dozen computers (and nearly as many OS's.)
Again, CIS is really the big thing running all the time... and one of the reasons I so like it is that it's so easy on resources, no matter what it's doing. Except when it's doing a whole system scan, I'm completely unable to detect any difference in system speed whether it's loaded and running, or loaded but disabled, or not loaded at all. CIS is pretty darned slick... way slicker than most people realize. When/if it finally gets really popular, it's gonna' really hurt the makers of similar fee-based products. And the soon-to-be-released version 4.x of CIS is rumored to be the really killer version that's going to take all of the complaints of its critics off the table... most notably, that its HIPS is just too much of a pain in the rear. The "Defense+" component of upcoming CIS version 4.x is rumored to be the most "silent" and unobtrusive of all HIPS products out there... bar none. This, of course, remains to be seen... but Comodo has never let me down. Ever. It's the best-kept secret on the Internet!
(And, no, I don't work for, or am a shill for, Comodo... just in case you're wondering.) [grin]
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: skywalker39Posted on 2009-04-16 at 18:34:04ID: 24164349
Hi jeffiepoo,
scrnrdr.exe is the virus. Have you tried uninstalling in Safe Mode?