[x]
Posted via EE Mobile

Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again.

Question
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

8.0

"Smart" Firewall Based on Multiple-User Input: If this concept doesn't exist, why not?

Asked by nicholasjwolf in Internet Security, Network Software Firewalls, Miscellaneous

Tags: firewall, user input, smart, multiple users

I've been wondering about a firewall concept.
Currently there are spam-filtering hardware devices and software programs that "learn" what is spam and what is not based on user input. Gmail is probably the best example that comes to mind (i.e. "this is spam" / "this is not spam").
What I'm wondering is why this user-input concept has not been applied to some sort of firewall solution? Granted, firewalls play a much more important role than spam filters (in my opinion, from a security standpoint at least). However, I'm imagining a standard software firewall that would work as usual ("Do you wish to allow this program access to the Internet? yes/no), but then take that a step further and compile the responses from all users of that firewall program. Then, once a large-enough number of users respond in a certain way, the firewall would either suggest an option to the user, or (optionally) have the software make the decision on its own. It could incorporate information such as destination IP address, hash-check of the program requesting access, etc. etc. Is anyone anywhere trying this? Bit9 seems to have something along these lines, but not exactly. So, why or why not have this type of firewall solution?
[+][-]04/09/09 03:11 PM, ID: 24112181Accepted Solution

View this solution now by starting your 30-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

About this solution

Zones: Internet Security, Network Software Firewalls, Miscellaneous
Tags: firewall, user input, smart, multiple users
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: StefanKittel
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: A
 
[+][-]04/09/09 03:25 PM, ID: 24112266Author Comment

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]04/10/09 12:49 AM, ID: 24113941Assisted Solution

Assisted solutions are selected by the member who asked the question as a comment that contributed to their question's solution.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Assisted Solution or ask the Experts your question.

 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20091111-EE-VQP-92 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_3_20080625