Why can you put the q on the end there? Also if its a contradiction doesn't that prove the argument invalid? I know the argument is valid because I used Matlab to construct a truth table to check it.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsHow do I use the rules of inference to show that the following is logically valid?
[(~p V q) -> r] /\ [s V ~q] /\ [~t] /\ [p -> t] /\ [(~p /\ r) -> ~s] => ~q
I've used Matlab to check that it is actually valid, but I need to show a proof using the rules of inference.
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
So using the rules of inference I can say
H1 (~p V q) -> r
H2 s V ~q
H3 ~t
H4 p -> t
H5 (~p /\ r) -> ~s
----------------
~q
so
H3 & H4
~t /\ p -> t
=> ~p (6) (modus tollens)
H5 & (6)
~p /\ (~p /\ r) -> ~s
=> ~p /\ ~p -> (r -> ~s) (exportation)
=> ~p -> (r -> ~s)
=> r -> ~s (7)
this is where I get stuck. In my head I can do the proof in like 4 steps but I'm having trouble laying it out in terms of the rules.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: ozoPosted on 2009-04-25 at 20:23:32ID: 24234482
suppose
[(~p V q) -> r] /\ [s V ~q] /\ [~t] /\ [p -> t] /\ [(~p /\ r) -> ~s] /\ q
then
[(~p V true) -> r] /\ [s V false] /\ [~t] /\ [p -> t] /\ [(~p /\ r) -> ~s]
[ r] /\ [s] /\ ~p /\ [(~p /\ r) -> ~s]
[s] /\ [~s]
is a contradiction