because the service is not officially ours and someone is paying us to host it so it has to be in a subdomain. The entire trick was to host it as a subdomain on our website instead of they making an entire domain for this service, so it's in our benefit that it's hosted next to our domain.
But why is www.sub.domain.com a disaster?
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: gwkgPosted on 2009-10-14 at 09:34:31ID: 25572401
www.sub.domain.com is a disaster ready to happen, but they have a point that #3 might be a little confusing.
Your real choices are to either go with #2 or create a url that redirects to the subdomain. http://domain.com/sub forwards to http://sub.domain.com.
Since the goal of your ad seems to be introducing the new URL, I would go with http://sub.domain.com
A question that your company needs to ask itself is:
If we feel that our target audience will be confused by a subdomain, then why are we using one?