The only issue with using E4X is performance . For huge sets of sets say for 20,000 rows of data it takes almost 23 secs to render when compared to using AMF which takes less than 2 secs . So thts a huge difference and it would affect the way we consume response from server.
check this out ..
http://www.jamesward.com/c
So this does not looks like an ideal solution
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: bgloddePosted on 2009-09-03 at 14:21:51ID: 25255087
Use E4X (Option 1) - it was created explicitly for consuming XML. Once you have received the data, it is referenced with an easy to understand syntax, using @ and . operators. There are many other useful features you get automatically as well (eg filter predicates).
pt.org/res ources/art icles/222/ 1/Intro- to -E4X/Page1 .html
A gentle introduction is presented here:
http://www.actionscri