Edited text of question
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsI have to make a choice between OWL and MFC. I am going to develop my 32-bit application in BC++ 5.0. What is preferred framework? What is advantages and drawbacks of each framework (not concerning the OWL support in BC++ 5 IDE)?
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Dear airat
check which environment, the mfc environment or the owl one , provides more properties for the default controls at design time.
what i mean is that using mfc (that is microsoft vc++) you have not the ability to set a lot of properties like background color or fonts for each default control like a button or an edit box, or the background color of a form(lucky vb or delphi programers!). You have to set these properties at run time using code or you have to use an external ocx that will have more design time properties.
Choose the environment that provides the biger set of design time properties for the default controls. It will save more of your time and money.
i agree with "msmits" that c++ builder is a good option.
Best regards.
go to:
http://www.inprise.com/bcp
and get a comparison between c++ builder 3 and vc.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: msmitsPosted on 1998-04-24 at 17:12:48ID: 1299627
If you are using BC++ 5.0, you probably want to use OWL. The environment understand the OWL classes, methods, callbacks. There is also integration with the resource editor.
It is my understanding that such support is not available for MFC from the BC++ 5.0 IDE. You need VC++ 5.0 for that. It gives you about the same facilities but then for MFC.
BTW. If you are going to to use Borland, be sure to get 5.02. It is more stable than the older versions. You should also think about starting with the newer C++Builder, instead of BC++.