Advertisement

Check out our new and improved Advanced Search! We have added additional search options and the ability to save your searches.
 
Enter Keywords:
 
1 - 10 of 75(0.01 seconds)
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

8.6
I WILL AWARD AN EXTRA 500 POINTS TO WHOEVER SOLVED THIS ISSUE. Our Exchange server is locked down tight, but we are having an issue that we have never seen.  Here is the config: Exchange 2000...
Zones: ExchangeDate Answered: 04/12/2003 Views: 0
Can anyone tell me what the following errors mean? From my Pervasive server log. I have (hopefully) repaired the table, but I would like to ensure this doesn't happen again if possible. 03-11-2...
Zones: BtrieveDate Answered: 04/21/2004 Views: 343
We have Dell Power Vault 110 LTO 2 tape drive, my question is how many concurent servers we can attach our tape drive. As i have check it have two interface. is that mean we can only attach two ser...
Zones: Removable Backup MediaDate Answered: 06/30/2007 Views: 0
In firewall, only allow packets with target port = 25, 80, 110, 443(HTTPS), 576(submition) and 8080(Tomcat) to come in. DNS is pointed to 3 outside servers; OS is Linux 7.2. The firewall is put out...
Zones: SecurityDate Answered: 10/11/2002 Views: 0
Dear Experts, I have a RedHat Linux 7.1 installed server which runs 20 workstations of WIn98/XP, all things running fine. but for the last few days one of the workstations is giving problems whi...
Zones: Outlook GroupwareDate Answered: 06/16/2003 Views: 0
Hi, I am currently have a Exchange 2000 Server SP3 setup on Win2K SP4. The SMTP server works internally and externally, but POP3 only works internally. I check the dns record wirh www.dnsreport.co...
Zones: ExchangeDate Answered: 03/29/2004 Views: 0
I've been fighting with this for a while.  I have a firewall on our Netopia router.  I have blocked port 110 for incomming and outgoing connections, also I have NAT enabled on this router and I am ...
Zones: Software FirewallsDate Answered: 11/29/2004 Views: 0
Hi all, I am using win XP with SP2, Zone Alarm pro 4.5 and norton AV 2003. I also have Spam Inspector 4 running with outlook express and when I do a port scan with Sheilds Up it shows that my...
Zones: Security, Consumer FirewallsDate Answered: 03/04/2005 Views: 0
Hi all, I am doing a search on Google for this information, but anyway, I purchased a Compaq Armada 110 laptop, and it was working fine yesterday! (It came in yesterday). I had Windows XP on the...
Zones: GeneralDate Answered: 01/18/2006 Views: 9
hi, i had in my computer win XP Pro in the first partition. then i installed linux SUSE for the first time. therefor win XP Pro dissappired . so i made fdisk and got correct result but when i ru...
Zones: HardwareDate Answered: 06/09/2005 Views: 28