Advertisement

Check out our new and improved Advanced Search! We have added additional search options and the ability to save your searches.
 
Enter Keywords:
 
1 - 2 of 2(0 seconds)
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

8.7
Hi guys, I have a BigIp 3DNS ver 4.5, If I'd like to do load balancing for my web servers (2 web servers are located at 2 difference places), do I need to have 2 BigIP 3DNS device ? or just one ...
Zones: Networking Hardware, Web Servers, Network Manag...Date Answered: 09/11/2008 Views: 30
Hi, Does anyone know if there are any ' open source ' global DNS load balancing stuff out there that I can use ( products similar to the F5 3DNS ). Thanks
Zones: DNS, GSM, Open SourceDate Asked: 11/18/2008 Points: 250 Comments: 5
  • 1