ProxySQL is a high-performance proxy, currently for MySQL and its forks (like Percona Server for MySQL and MariaDB). It acts as an intermediary for client requests seeking resources from the database. It was created for DBAs by René Cannaò, as a means of solving complex replication topology issues. When bringing up ProxySQL with my clients, I always get questions about where it fits into the architecture. This post should clarify that.
Before continuing, you might want to know why you should use this software. The features that are of interest include:
In general, you install it on nodes that do not have a running MySQL database. You manage it via the MySQL command line on another port, usually 6032. Once it is started the configuration in /etc is not used, and you do everything within the CLI. The backend database is actually SQLite, and the db file is stored in /var/lib/proxysql.
There are many guides out there on initializing and installing it, so I won’t cover those details here. It can be as simple as:
While most first think to install ProxySQL on a standalone node between the application and database, this has the potential to affect query performance due to the additional latency from network hops.
To have minimal impact on performance (and avoid the additional network hop), many recommend installing ProxySQL on the application servers. The application then connects to ProxySQL (acting as a MySQL server) on localhost, using Unix Domain Socket, and avoiding extra latency. It would then use its routing rules to reach out and talk to the actual MySQL servers with its own connection pooling. The application doesn’t have any idea what happens beyond its connection to ProxySQL.
Another consideration is reducing your network attack surface. This means attempting to control all of the possible vulnerabilities in your network’s hardware and software that are accessible to unauthenticated users.
Percona generally suggests that you put a ProxySQL instance on each application host, like in the second image above. This suggestion is certainly valid for reducing latency in your database environment (by limiting network jumps). But while this is good for performance, it can be bad for security.
Every instance must be able to talk to:
As you can imagine, this is a security nightmare. With every instance, you have x many more connections spanning your network. That’s x many more connections an attacker might exploit.
Instead, it can be better to have one or more ProxySQL instances that are between your application and MySQL servers (like the first image above). This provides a reasonable DMZ-type setup that prevents opening too many connections across the network.
That said, both architectures are valid production configurations – depending on your requirements.
Have a question about something in this article? You can receive help directly from the article author. Sign up for a free trial to get started.