A recent post by Brian Matis motivated me to make this alternate post to see what sort of reaction others might have about these recent revelations.

A recent article on The Verge claims that "The older operating system was less vulnerable that anyone expected"

Windows XP computers were mostly immune to WannaCry

Another article from the same source claims "Windows XP was ‘insignificant,’ researchers say" with regards to helping the WannaCry outbreak spread.

"Almost all WannaCry victims were running Windows 7"

Lots of folks (from their perspective) with a genuine need to keep running on Windows XP suffered a lot of grief in Tech forums as being one of the root causes of giving WannaCry a platform to spread and thrive from, yet now it appears all the criticism may have been a little premature and unjustified.

For the record, I personally don't condone anyone using unsupported operating systems and actively encourage everyone I deal with to get themselves up to date, but I am also sympathetic to those who feel they have a genuine need to do that, so also think they shouldn't be condemned so quickly as being the root cause of allowing malicious software to spread.

These folks still need our expertise and support and should be given it wherever possible imo, including advising them of alternate cost effective ways they might be able to continue running their proprietary hardware or software solutions that may not readily run on later Windows version releases. I also applaud Microsoft for not taking the high road and issuing a critical patch in cases like this.

What are your thoughts on this topic?

Please discuss..
0
LVL 1

Administrative Comment

by:ModeIT
what i'd like is the ratio of how many computers still have Xp on them.  I imagine it isn't very many, and that could be a huge factor in them not being infected much..
0
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:Thomas Zucker-Scharff
We have too many XP computers at my institution (some with only SP2) - mostly due to budgets and instrumentation.
0
LVL 20

Author Comment

by:Andrew Leniart
Hi Thomas,
Have you considered purchasing an XP Updates agreement with Microsoft? Might be an easier solution if budget restraints prevent you from upgrading? I wouldn't feel comfortable with a lot of XP machines in an environment as it would be a case of when, not if, it will come back to bite you.  Patches are available, just at a cost.

Incidentally, SP3 for XP is still provided by Microsoft - why not install it?

Steps to take before you install Windows XP Service Pack 3

How to obtain Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3)

Cheers..
0

Keep in touch with Experts Exchange

Tech news and trends delivered to your inbox every month