We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

We've partnered with Certified Experts, Carl Webster and Richard Faulkner, to bring you a podcast all about Citrix Workspace, moving to the cloud, and analytics & intelligence. Episode 2 coming soon!Listen Now

x

PowerPC Assembler

charles122996
on
Medium Priority
1,817 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-26

I am trying to inline PPC assembler with Codewarrior 10 - but not the way it's normally done with CodeWarrior (without a function call if possible) and cannot figure out how to do it  Specifically, in the 68k world, I can use the following with no problems:

#pragma parameter SwitchStack(__A0)
extern void SwitchStack(SR *sr) =
{
    0x2178, 0x0BAE, 0x0010,
    .
    .
    .
    0x2E68, 0x0004
};

The call to SwitchStack is placed in my code and I switch stacks.  Later I restore my stack with another inline assembler routine.  I found the basis for this routine for the 68k on AppleLink years ago. The "classic" way to
inline code messes up the link register.  Is there an equivalent SwitchStack routine for the PowerPC that matches what the switch stack for the 68k does?

Thanks for your help,

Charles Copeland
Useful Software, Inc.

Comment
Watch Question

Commented:
CodeWarrior doesn't support what you are trying to do. The opcode inline style function is not supported by the PowerPC C or C++ compilers. And the PowerPC compilers don't allow you to specify which registers are used for parameters. See "Inside CodeWarrior 10," CL-38.

The PowerPC compilers do support inlined asm functions, but because they are real functions the compiler will determine register usage, and the link register is set before your code is entered. This is implied by the requirement documented on page CL-112 that every PowerPC assembly function must end in a "blr" instruction.

Even if all of these obstacles could be overcome somehow, the PowerPC optimizer would likely confound all of your efforts, and you'd have to make a lot of assumptions about what the compiler and optimizer will do.

Metrowerks has said publicly that they don't intend to support inlined blocks of assembly code in either the 68K or PowerPC compilers.

Not the solution you were looking for? Getting a personalized solution is easy.

Ask the Experts
Access more of Experts Exchange with a free account
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Create a free account to continue.

Limited access with a free account allows you to:

  • View three pieces of content (articles, solutions, posts, and videos)
  • Ask the experts questions (counted toward content limit)
  • Customize your dashboard and profile

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.