Solaris flock/lockf...problems with UCB libs

I am porting code from IRIX 5.3 to Solaris 2.4.  The code
compiles and works fine on IRIX, but I have had some problems with flock (and now lockf) on the Solaris system.
The first problem I had was:
(1) I attempted to compile using /usr/ucb/cc the result was:   cc:  language optional software package not installed

In order to avoid this problem I used gcc instead.  I added
"/usr/ucbinclude/" to my include paths, "/usr/ucblib" to my
library paths, and "-lucb -lsocket -lnsl" to my libraries.

(2)I created a simple test program that simply opens a file
and then uses flock() to lock it.  I got everything to
compile, but when I run the executable one of two things
happens:
 (a) If the file I am opening does not exist before program
     execution and is created by the call to open(), i get
     a valid file descriptor, and then pass it to flock.
     flock() returns -1, and sets errno=22 (Invalid
     arguments)--incedentally, i am using LOCK_EX
 (b) If the file exists prior to execution, and is simply
     opened by the call to open, then I get back a valid
     file descriptor, and pass it to flock.  flock() still
     returns -1 and this time sets errno=9 (Bad file number)

(3)So I assumed the problem was with flock(), and attempted
to avoid the UCB libraries all together by switching all
file locking to use lockf().  Now my test program fails on
the call to lockf(), except this time I have errno=11 which
is "Resource temporarily unavailable".

It seems as if open() and flock() are referencing different
file descriptor tables.  I think the problem has to do with
linking, and may be related to the fact that I am using gcc
instead of /usr/ucb/cc.  Other information that may be
relevant is that the file it is attempting to open/lock is
on an NFS mounted drive (although I can't see this having
any effect on the file locking).  If somebody knows the
solution to my problem I would greatly appreciate it.

Thanks,
Barry M. Caceres
barryc@alumni.caltech.edu
barrycAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

ian010997Commented:
You seem to be from cal-tech, but why are you still using /usr/ucb (UC Berkely...spelling??)?

Use POSIX.1 for all your Unix file manipulations if at all possible.  flock(3) is a POSIX.1 function and should be all you will need.

If you do a:

#define _POSIX_SOURCE 1

in your C programs (function libraries) that need POSIX.1, you should be in the clear if your compiler supports POSIX.1 which most do, but I doubt /usr/ucb/cc does.

I have had MAJOR problems using ``ucb'' on Sun machines before.  The best bet I have gone with is using POSIX.1 functions.

There is a VERY good book published on POSIX.1:

The POSIX Programmer's Guied by Donald Lewine published by O'Reilly & Assoc.

You shouldn't have any more problems porting from IRIX to POSIX.1 (since POSIX.1 is mostly SysVR4 which is mostly IRIX) if you use the define I gave you and use the functions in the book above with the standard compiler on a Sun.

What's more, since IRIX and Solaris are both SysVR4, you shouldn't use the ``ucb'' libs, compilers, etc. anyway.  ``ucb'' is BSD Unix not SysVR4.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
System Programming

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.