tlyons
asked on
fread vs. FSRead
Using CW 10 on a 604 based Mac-clone I have a C program that reads a binary file a few bytes at a time. The SIOUX implemented fread() function is almost 10 times faster than the Mac Toolbox function FSRead() at reading the whole file. I would have thought that fread() just calls FSRead() but apparently that's not the case. Is the problem just buffering? Does fread() have built in buffering that FSRead() lacks?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.