Solved

Are SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO valid options on setsockopt under OS/2 ?

Posted on 1997-03-25
1
592 Views
Last Modified: 2008-02-26
Are SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO valid options on setsockopt under OS/2 ?
If not, is there anyway to set the timeout values. BSD seems to allow
this as well as some winsock implementations. TIA

Roy Berger
rberger@mctinc.com
0
Comment
Question by:roybrew
1 Comment
 

Accepted Solution

by:
prade earned 50 total points
ID: 1162445
try switching to nonblocking calls and handling the timeout by yourself.

0

Featured Post

DevOps Toolchain Recommendations

Read this Gartner Research Note and discover how your IT organization can automate and optimize DevOps processes using a toolchain architecture.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Errors will happen. It is a fact of life for the programmer. How and when errors are detected have a great impact on quality and cost of a product. It is better to detect errors at compile time, when possible and practical. Errors that make their wa…
Unlike C#, C++ doesn't have native support for sealing classes (so they cannot be sub-classed). At the cost of a virtual base class pointer it is possible to implement a pseudo sealing mechanism The trick is to virtually inherit from a base class…
The goal of the video will be to teach the user the difference and consequence of passing data by value vs passing data by reference in C++. An example of passing data by value as well as an example of passing data by reference will be be given. Bot…
The viewer will learn how to clear a vector as well as how to detect empty vectors in C++.

831 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question