warning C4270

warning C4270: 'initializing' : do not initialize a non-const 'class ::String __near &' with a non-lvalue 'class ::String ' function return

This is my first test question.
I would like to know if this is a legitimate warning of if it is a bug in the compiler(MS C++ 1.52).

in book Teach Yourself C++ in 21 days ( Perry)
   there is a reference that it is a bug.
   (sorry i dont know the page)

here is the statement that gives the warning.    
    *m_pName = setName();  : warning C4270 etc.

the relevant declarations are
    String * m_pName;
    String setName();
 
the definition is

String Column::setName()
{
   String ans="dummy";
   return ans;
}

looking at the statement
   *m_pName = setName();

The String pointed to by *m_pName calls it's  operator= and copies in the contents of the String in setName(). This is precisely what I want it to do and cannot  see why the compiler has any justification for complaining.
cgardnerAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Webinar] Streamline your web hosting managementRegister Today

x
 
yonatConnect With a Mentor Commented:
The declaration
String * m_pName;
will definetily cause problems, since you don't set memory space
for the String pointed by m_pName. In other words, m_pName does
not point to a valid String. Instead, use
String * m_pName = new String;
or just plain old
String m_Name;
If you use the latter, then m_Name = setName() should work.
But, like mikeblass said, it depends on the definition of
String::operator=(const String&). Form the warning, I suspect
that it is wrongly declared String::operator=(String&) - without
the const.
0
 
mikeblasCommented:
To get an accurate answer, you'll need to show the definition and declaration of operator=() in the String class you wrote.

.B ekiM
0
 
cgardnerAuthor Commented:
Thanks, your right.. I forgot the const in operator =
which caused the C4270

also I forgot to initialize..  Bonus


 

0
All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.