warning C4270

warning C4270: 'initializing' : do not initialize a non-const 'class ::String __near &' with a non-lvalue 'class ::String ' function return

This is my first test question.
I would like to know if this is a legitimate warning of if it is a bug in the compiler(MS C++ 1.52).

in book Teach Yourself C++ in 21 days ( Perry)
   there is a reference that it is a bug.
   (sorry i dont know the page)

here is the statement that gives the warning.    
    *m_pName = setName();  : warning C4270 etc.

the relevant declarations are
    String * m_pName;
    String setName();
 
the definition is

String Column::setName()
{
   String ans="dummy";
   return ans;
}

looking at the statement
   *m_pName = setName();

The String pointed to by *m_pName calls it's  operator= and copies in the contents of the String in setName(). This is precisely what I want it to do and cannot  see why the compiler has any justification for complaining.
cgardnerAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

mikeblasCommented:
To get an accurate answer, you'll need to show the definition and declaration of operator=() in the String class you wrote.

.B ekiM
0
yonatCommented:
The declaration
String * m_pName;
will definetily cause problems, since you don't set memory space
for the String pointed by m_pName. In other words, m_pName does
not point to a valid String. Instead, use
String * m_pName = new String;
or just plain old
String m_Name;
If you use the latter, then m_Name = setName() should work.
But, like mikeblass said, it depends on the definition of
String::operator=(const String&). Form the warning, I suspect
that it is wrongly declared String::operator=(String&) - without
the const.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
cgardnerAuthor Commented:
Thanks, your right.. I forgot the const in operator =
which caused the C4270

also I forgot to initialize..  Bonus


 

0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
C++

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.