Solved

const method not being used

Posted on 1997-06-25
8
247 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-10
say I have:

template <class T>
class Foo
{
   public:
      T& operator * ();
      const T& operator * () const;
};

int main()
{
   Foo<int> fred;

   int &ri1 = *fred;
   const int &ri1 = *fred;
}

both lines call the non-const op *.  I thought I remeber const methods were suposed to be called if they could be.  
0
Comment
Question by:strobert
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 4
8 Comments
 
LVL 5

Accepted Solution

by:
yonat earned 150 total points
ID: 1164131
The const method would have been called if fred was const:

const Foo<int> cfred;
Foo<int> fred;

const int &cr = *cfred; // const method called
int &r = *cfred; // error
int &r2 = *fred; // non-const method called

> const methods were suposed to be called if they could be.
Not exactly. If a methid is overloaded by constness, the const
method will be called for const objects, and the non-const
method otherwise.
In any case, the return value is never considered in overloading
resolution.

0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:strobert
ID: 1164132
is the abiltiy to overload by const spec'd anywhere? (I couldn't find it in stroustrup)

also, reason why I wanted this...(if you want to try a solution to this add a comment and I'll up the points)

I have a vector class.  I am creating an external iterating class
I would like the same itr class to be used for iterating on const  vector's and non-const vector's.  I was going to keep a state variable as to what the itr was contructed with (a Vector& or a const vector&) and in the T& op * throw an exception if we were itring on a const vector&...
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:yonat
ID: 1164133
> is the abiltiy to overload by const spec'd anywhere?

Check out the latest version of the ANSI C++ draft standard at
http://www.cygnus.com/misc/wp/dec96pub/over.html

Basically, it sais that a member function is like a regular
function with one extra argument: a pointer to the object (this)
[There are many differences, but this view help to understand
overloading]. This means that you can overload by the constness
of the this argument.

> I would like the same itr class to be used for iterating on
> const vector's and non-const vector's. I was going to keep a
> state variable as to what the itr was contructed with (a
> Vector& or a const vector&) and in the T& op * throw an
> exception if we were itring on a const vector&...

Your solution sounds OK, just keep in mind that the error will
only be discovered at runtime instead if at compile time.
Another solution is to have two classes: iter and const_iter.
Instead of constructing an iterator by
iter i(a_vector);
You can add a member function to vector that returns an iterator
to the beginning (or end) of the vector:

class vector
{
public:
    // ...
    iter begin();
    const_iter begin() const;
};

This way the user of vector will get the correct iterator class,
without having to worry about it.

> I have a vector class.

Why write your own vector instead of using STL?

You can get STL from
* http://www.ipmce.su/~fbp/stl/

And there are several short tutorials at:
* http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL/stl_introduction.html
* http://www.objectplace.com/technology/articles/9508.shtml
* http://www.cs.brown.edu/people/jak/programming/stl-tutorial/
                          tutorial.html
* http://www.infosys.tuwien.ac.at/Research/Component/
                                  tutorial/prwmain.htm
0
Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:strobert
ID: 1164134
Run-time was fine with me (basically it is an assert like case so runtime is fine just like out of bounds on a bracket)

good thought with the begin...
I will probably either go with that or the two class (Itr and ConstItr) method.

Why I don't use the STL:
1) I actually have some philisophical disagreements with the way it does things.
2) wether I like it or not, I can't use it.  My dev platform is VC++ under windows and the STL implementation Microsquish ships makes it almost unusable.  Plus given the way the STL tends to abuse templates I wouldn't trust it under VC++ since there are a lot of broken things in VC++ templates.
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:yonat
ID: 1164135
> I actually have some philisophical disagreements with the way
> [STL] does things.

They don't use inheritence - true. But that gains a lot of
efficiency since all the little functions (operator++ etc) are
inlined. I think that STL is an eficient and usuable solution
to a wide variety of problems (but maybe not yours ...)

> My dev platform is VC++ under windows and the STL
> implementation Microsquish ships makes it almost unusable

The STL from http://www.ipmce.su/~fbp/stl/  works well with VC++
4.0, 4.1 and 4.2 . They say it is "partially compatible" with 5.0 .

Good luck!
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:strobert
ID: 1164136
Inheritance is one of the things, but yes it is understanable not to use it for speed.  I think my biggest gripe is actually the naming conventions...maybe they will grow on me..

I'll give that stl version a look... I'll be impressed if it is still nice under VC++

thanks


0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:strobert
ID: 1164137
Adjusted points to 150
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:yonat
ID: 1164138
> I'll give that stl version a look... I'll be impressed if it is
> still nice under VC++

I just found out that there is an STL version adapted for VC5
available from:
http://www.sirius.com/~ouchida/

0

Featured Post

On Demand Webinar - Networking for the Cloud Era

This webinar discusses:
-Common barriers companies experience when moving to the cloud
-How SD-WAN changes the way we look at networks
-Best practices customers should employ moving forward with cloud migration
-What happens behind the scenes of SteelConnect’s one-click button

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Go is an acronym of golang, is a programming language developed Google in 2007. Go is a new language that is mostly in the C family, with significant input from Pascal/Modula/Oberon family. Hence Go arisen as low-level language with fast compilation…
Container Orchestration platforms empower organizations to scale their apps at an exceptional rate. This is the reason numerous innovation-driven companies are moving apps to an appropriated datacenter wide platform that empowers them to scale at a …
The goal of the video will be to teach the user the difference and consequence of passing data by value vs passing data by reference in C++. An example of passing data by value as well as an example of passing data by reference will be be given. Bot…
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.

751 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question