Solved

Masquearde and size of PC needed to run it

Posted on 1997-07-16
4
217 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-17
I have set up a linux box only to perform ip masquerading for our private network to the internet.  The machine I have in place is doing a perfect job.  It is a pentium 166, 64 MB RAM, and has a 1.2 GB hard drive.  I need that horsepower somewhere else.  My question is what size of machine would be adequate enough to perform masquerading for 60 workstations?
0
Comment
Question by:scrutchfield
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:scrutchfield
ID: 1585577
Edited text of question
0
 
LVL 1

Accepted Solution

by:
mgrcnk earned 20 total points
ID: 1585578
I don't think that machine size will affect anything.  You will however have to worry about bandwidth.  We have a Sparc 1 doing firewall service for our university and it runs fine.  True, you will be transforming IP addresses, but it doesn't take much horsepower to do that.  Instead, look at what ethernet card you have.  60 machines all trying to use a single 10BaseT card would bottleneck rather quickly.  A 100BaseT or even FibreChannel network adaptor would work much better (depending on how much bandwidth you need and have past that machine).

In any case, processor speed won't make much of a difference (unless you're talking about a 10 MHz processor or something else ridiculously slow).

chris
0
 

Author Comment

by:scrutchfield
ID: 1585579
So then would something like a 486 DX2 66 with 16 MB RAM be sufficient?
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:mgrcnk
ID: 1585580
Definitely.  A Sparc 1 (our firewall) can handle a class B network (we have thousands of computers).  Granted, it only logs packets and forwards them on, but masquerading doesn't do much more than that.  It just translates addresses.

If would only start getting shakey if you were using a 386, 4 MB RAM, and running X.

For dedicated processes like that (we have DHCP boosters here), we use 486/50's I believe.  All they do is take a DHCP request from a remote network and tunnel it through a cable modem.  Never had a problem with that, so I doubt you will either.

chris
0

Featured Post

Free learning courses: Active Directory Deep Dive

Get a firm grasp on your IT environment when you learn Active Directory best practices with Veeam! Watch all, or choose any amount, of this three-part webinar series to improve your skills. From the basics to virtualization and backup, we got you covered.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Help with Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 10 139
Linux VM running slow, receiving INFO: task : blocked for more than 120 seconds errors 17 259
Cron jobs 12 141
OpenVPN Speed limitation to only 10 mbps 7 234
I have seen several blogs and forum entries elsewhere state that because NTFS volumes do not support linux ownership or permissions, they cannot be used for anonymous ftp upload through the vsftpd program.   IT can be done and here's how to get i…
Note: for this to work properly you need to use a Cross-Over network cable. 1. Connect both servers S1 and S2 on the second network slots respectively. Note that you can use the 1st slots but usually these would be occupied by the Service Provide…
Exchange organizations may use the Journaling Agent of the Transport Service to archive messages going through Exchange. However, if the Transport Service is integrated with some email content management application (such as an antispam), the admini…

726 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question