We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

We've partnered with Certified Experts, Carl Webster and Richard Faulkner, to bring you a podcast all about Citrix Workspace, moving to the cloud, and analytics & intelligence. Episode 2 coming soon!Listen Now

x

Distinguishing between Back and Next in

shruthi
shruthi asked
on
Medium Priority
220 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-20
I am using the Custom App Wizard to make one of my own custom wizards.

For each step in my custom wizard, an OnDismiss handler is generated. All validation of data for this step is to be done in this function (according to the comments inserted by the AppWizard). This handler is called whenever the user hits Next, Back or Finish in the wizards.

I would like to do some validation - but only if the user hit either the Next or the Finish button.  I don't want to bother validating if the user hit the Back button.

While in this handler, I can't seem to find a  way to let me know which button(Back/Next/Finish) was pressed. Any hints?  

Comment
Watch Question

Commented:
Override CCustomAppWiz::Back() and set a custom flag indicating the user pressed Back.
This gives you the ability to avoid doing your validations in CCustomAppWiz::OnDismiss() when the flag is set. In any case, turn off the flag in this method.

Davide Marcato.

Author

Commented:
I doubt that this would work.  I have looked at it and the OnDismiss handler is called before the CCustomAppWiz::Back or
CCustomAppWiz::Next routine is called.  So, there is really no use in my setting a flag in the Back or Next routines - by then,
the code would have already walked through the validation in the
OnDismiss routine.
Commented:
Oops! You are right.
A wild guess...maybe the clicked button has the focus when OnDismiss() is called?

Davide Marcato.

Not the solution you were looking for? Getting a personalized solution is easy.

Ask the Experts

Author

Commented:
Thanks Davide!  The clicked button does seem to have the focus when the OnDismiss handler is called.  I would have preferred a far-more direct interface for this functionality, but I guess I'll have to be satisfied with this!

Commented:
I get your point, but a (pretty) dirty workaround is better than nothing, isn't it?

Davide Marcato.
Access more of Experts Exchange with a free account
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Create a free account to continue.

Limited access with a free account allows you to:

  • View three pieces of content (articles, solutions, posts, and videos)
  • Ask the experts questions (counted toward content limit)
  • Customize your dashboard and profile

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.