Solved

Sybase using JFS instead of Raw Partitions

Posted on 1997-09-03
1
485 Views
Last Modified: 2008-03-17
Sybase is adamant that we should not use the AIX JFS.  We could have data integrity problems.  They won't get specific on how an why.  Oracle uses JFS and works just fine.  Sybase also installs by default using NT file systems.  What gives?  We have been testing on a small AIX box using the Journal File System (JFS) instead of Raw Partitions.  We have tried a number of update processes and have literally pulled the plug on the box.  It recovers nicely.  I need a straight answer. So far testing has only shown Sybase needs to get their act together. JFS is fast!
0
Comment
Question by:blacks
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
1 Comment
 
LVL 5

Accepted Solution

by:
n0thing earned 200 total points
ID: 1098020
Hi,

   I would recommend you to use raw partition instead of JFS ...
I'm having problems using ufs(Solaris 2.5 FS). I was using ufs,
and my database is kinda huge (18 gig). I've to insert around
500.000 rows a day and doing large SELECT on it... much faster with raw. Also, Sybase does recover more quickly with raw than Unix FS. It will work just fine with small database, but if you want to add on more partition to it, the more you add the worse performance gets. If you need some real testing, lets try to insert/update/delete 10000 rows with raw & with JFS. You'll see the difference. The way Sybase writes its data in raw is more efficient than JFS. I think in the Sybase man page somewhere, it
does explain why you should use raw instead of JFS. I don't have it here, but right now I'm maitaining 6 different Sybase databases with over 1 millions records in/out every day. Raw is much faster, specially on recovery, took me usually 1-2 hours to
recover my database now instead of 3-6 hours. I'm on a Sparc Ultra 2 with dual CPU and 384Megs of memory on it. If your database is small and doesn't do intense queries/updates like mine. Just use the fs you like. Otherwise go for raw.
   Just my little comments. If you need more details, you should
talk to an independant Sybase expert and get Sybase docs on raw vs Unix fs.

Regards,
Minh Lai

0

Featured Post

Want Experts Exchange at your fingertips?

With Experts Exchange’s latest app release, you can now experience our most recent features, updates, and the same community interface while on-the-go. Download our latest app release at the Android or Apple stores today!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Getting to know the threat landscape in which DDoS has evolved, and making the right choice to get ourselves geared up to defend against  DDoS attacks effectively. Get the necessary preparation works done and focus on Doing the First Things Right.
This article describes how to import Lotus Notes Contacts into Outlook 2016, 2013, 2010 and 2007 etc. with a few manual steps. You can easily export and migrate Lotus Notes contacts into Microsoft Outlook without having to use any third party tools.
NetCrunch network monitor is a highly extensive platform for network monitoring and alert generation. In this video you'll see a live demo of NetCrunch with most notable features explained in a walk-through manner. You'll also get to know the philos…
If you’ve ever visited a web page and noticed a cool font that you really liked the look of, but couldn’t figure out which font it was so that you could use it for your own work, then this video is for you! In this Micro Tutorial, you'll learn yo…
Suggested Courses

635 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question