• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 875
  • Last Modified:

C++ Language question

I am trying to build a generic Library class under HP-UX
using RogueWave and HP C++. Basically, I want to implement
the Library class as follows :

template <class T> class Library {
private :
    RWBoolean loaded_; // Whether Library<T> has been loaded
    RWTValSlist<T> *list_;

public :
    Library(const RWDBDatabase&);
    ~Library();
    int numEntries(void); // number of entries in Library<T>
    int reset(void); // recreate Library<T> on demand
};

I then want to pass in any T using the constructor in
Library to call a load() method in T for the Library's
initial load. T could be defined as follows :

class myClass {
private :
    RWCString fld1_;
    RWCString fld2_;
    ...

public :
    myClass();
    ~myClass();
    void *load(RWDBDatabase&); // returns a pointer to a
                               // RWTValSlist (cast is done)
    // comparision method for finding a matching item
    RWBoolean compare(const myClass&, myClass *);
    ...;
};

This will provide an easy way of building a Library of
items (i.e. Library<myClass> myClassLibrary), searching for
a value and only needing to provide the item implementation
and load() and compare() methods in T while treating each
Library "in a similar fashion". Unfortunately, the compiler
doesn't like this...the Library() constructor is :

template<class T>
Library<T>::Library(const RWDBDatabase& aDB)
{
    list_ = *((RWTValSlist<T> *) T::load(aDB));
    loaded_ = TRUE;
}

But, as guessed, the compiler doesn't like this
implementation because it doesn't know the size of T yet.
Any suggestions as to a suitable implementation or other
similar class? (P.S. I also want to store a generic
comparision function pointer (i.e. RWBoolean compare(const
T&, T *item)) in the Library but this has caused similar
compiler complications so I have left this member out of
Library). Thx for any info or suggestions. Send responses to
roche@instinet.com...

L8r...
0
roche
Asked:
roche
  • 3
  • 3
1 Solution
 
md041797Commented:
The problem is that you either need a static member function or an object instance to call the load function.  Its hard to tell which would apply in your case, but I would guess the static member function:

class myClass {
  ...
  static void *load(RWDBDatabase&); // returns a pointer to a
  ...;
  };

You can call this with myClass::load.  The compiler will translate from T::load.  You cannot use any non-static members in this function's code.

If you need to change to an object instance consider:

template<class T>
Library<T>::Library(const RWDBDatabase& aDB, T &t)
{
  list_ = *((RWTValSlist<T> *) t.load(aDB));
  loaded_ = TRUE;
  }

The point is, you either have an object to work with, or you don't.


Also, this is faulty:
  list_ = *<<--- You are dereferencing here.  Probably not your intent.
    ((RWTValSlist<T> *) t.load(aDB));


                     But, as gues
0
 
md041797Commented:
Note:   I made both types of changes and it compiled with no complaints on my system.
0
 
rocheAuthor Commented:
The solution seems simple enough and seems like it SHOULD work...
Unfortunately the HP-UX compiler returns the following :

    error : initializer for member load (1170)

It seems that defining load() in myClass' header file as :

    static void *load(RWDBDatabase&);

and defining the function in a myClass.cxx file as :

    void *load(RWDBDatabase& aDB) {
        ...
    }

causes problems. If I can get it to work the points are
definitely yours... Any suggestions?!?!?
0
VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

 
rocheAuthor Commented:
It seems that defining load() as follows in myClass' header file :
    static void *load(RWDBDatabase&);

and in the myClass.cxx file as :

    void *load(RWDBDatabase& aDB) {
        ...
    }

causes the following error :

    error : initializer for load()

The solution semms simple but I want to test it first (I had
already tried the definition of an object as the other alternate
solution, to no avail). Any suggestions?!?!
0
 
md041797Commented:
This kind of weird error is usually caused by the parser getting confused.  You probably missed a closing } or something.  Post the whole thing so I can see what's wrong.  What does the manual say that this error means?  Its not clear to me.
0
 
rocheAuthor Commented:
Problem turned out to be as MD stated and also the fact that the linker couldn't figure out where it put the templatized, compiled
file myClass.c after it built it. The solution -- make sure the
"-I." option is set. This way the linker knows what the compiler
is doing. I could never understand this under UNIX. If you put
something somewhere (a compiled/templatized file), shouldn't your
partner in crime know where it is. Gives new meaning to the term
"artificial intelligence". Anyway, thanx for the answer to my
silly mistake of excluding "static"...
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 3
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now