Blocking on WinExec in Delphi 1.0

Is there a way to spawn a process in Delphi 1.0 and wait for it to run to completion?  WinExec() continues without waiting for the process to complete.
mozackAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
98113772Connect With a Mentor Commented:
Hi,

Try this one:

Function WinExecAndWait(Path : string; Visibility : word) : word;
var
  InstanceID : THandle;
  PathLen : integer;
begin
  { inplace conversion of a String to a PChar }
  PathLen := Length(Path);
  Move(Path[1],Path[0],PathLen);
  Path[PathLen] := #0;
  { Try to run the application }
  InstanceID := WinExec(@Path,Visibility);
  if InstanceID < 32 then { a value less than 32 indicates an Exec error }
     WinExecAndWait := InstanceID
  else
  begin
    Repeat
      Application.ProcessMessages;
    until Application.Terminated or (GetModuleUsage(InstanceID) = 0);
    WinExecAndWait := 32;
  end;
end;


<--- Cut --->

Greatings from Denmark
Claus Ziegler
0
 
mozackAuthor Commented:
No. ProcessMessages gives the control back to windows. The code
is fine.
0
 
kriszCommented:
Hi,

No draining of the CPU is done. My answer is right. the "ProcessMessages" gives control back to windows.

Greatings from Denmark
Claus Ziegler
0
Introducing Cloud Class® training courses

Tech changes fast. You can learn faster. That’s why we’re bringing professional training courses to Experts Exchange. With a subscription, you can access all the Cloud Class® courses to expand your education, prep for certifications, and get top-notch instructions.

 
98113772Commented:
I'm running this process on Windows NT, I don't know if this has anything to do with performance, but when I run:

Repeat
   Application.ProcessMessages;
Until Application.Terminated;

Some 97% of the CPU gets used.  When I start up other processes, the other processes have to fight for CPU usage with this process.
0
 
mozackAuthor Commented:
Yes, but it only uses the 97% when noone else needs it. As you can see, it will get lower and lower when you starts more processes up.

Greatings from Denmark
Claus Ziegler
0
 
98113772Commented:
Exactly, whereas a real Sleep() would not use any CPU at all.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.