Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 285
  • Last Modified:

387 emulator

I'm searching for a free 387 emulator tha runs under Windows 3.11.
If You have one, please mail to:

             s85201@cclix1.polito.it
0
Gino121597
Asked:
Gino121597
1 Solution
 
tabitCommented:
Dear Gino,

387 is half a 386DX, as you probably know.

It is - to be exact - a working FP-unit picked from the 'bad'-die-pile in Intels founderies about 5 years ago.

Either your software is able to emulate the missing floating-point-unit, or you should visit one of the second-hand-PC-vendors and replace your 386SX with a 386DX (upgrade-costs about 2 US$)

Everything else does not make sense in your case.

regards

tabit
0
 
parentiCommented:
Usually 387 emulators did not perform well both in WIN 3.11 and in DOS. They tend to make your system unstable conflicting with other TSR and so on and are/not are able to work in protected mode. I think it is better to go and buy a few dollars chip (a real 387).

Anyway
http://www.irtech.com/treehous/files/G417.htm 
give you the choice to test them.
0
 
parentiCommented:
Adding to the previous comment: look in
http://www.cpdee.ufmg.br/simtel/simtel_index_mathcopr.html
0
Improved Protection from Phishing Attacks

WatchGuard DNSWatch reduces malware infections by detecting and blocking malicious DNS requests, improving your ability to protect employees from phishing attacks. Learn more about our newest service included in Total Security Suite today!

 
Gino121597Author Commented:
Sorry, but this is a hardware solution, and I would prefer a sotfware solution, till my applications are't so intensive fpu users
0
 
tabitCommented:
If you want the software-solution, use it. Parenti recommend an FPU-emulator. But for performance-reasons I would strongly recommend the 2$-upgrade to a 386DX (which "includes" the 387)

Never emulate something that you can have in hardware for the same price. You can expect in the case of the 387, that the performance will be worse than without the emulator.
0
 
evil_edCommented:
Yoooh Tabit ...

Where did you get the idea that a 386 contains a copro ???

you're mixing things up a little , 486 dx contains a copro
but not the 386 ... :-)

to much champagne on christmas evening perhaps ... ho ho ho

merry christmas ...
0
 
tabitCommented:
evil ed:

sorry, I missed that. I switched directly from 286 to 486SX to Pentium. But you would certainly agree to the point that to have a hardware 387 for 2 bucks is a much better solution that to slow down the slow 386 with an emulator.

Gino:

did you try the emulator parenti recommended?
0
 
parentiCommented:
I cannot understand in which sense the SW I proposed you are an HW solutions. May be that some mis-alligment in the chat has been there.

So I only can give you again the pointers to the SW-only solution(s) you can try (you will find a tenth of them for any pointer!)

1) http://www.irtech.com/treehous/files/G417.htm 
2) http://www.cpdee.ufmg.br/simtel/simtel_index_mathcopr.html 

I want to recall that usually the 387 emulators did not perform well both in WIN 3.11 and in DOS (you must choose). They tend to make your system unstable conflicting with other TSR and so on and are/not are able to work in protected mode.

If you were going to work with it,  I definitively think it could be better to go and buy a few dollars chip (a real 387), but if you are playing you can try.

I think that no more can be said on the matter.

My best regards.

Anyway
http://www.irtech.com/treehous/files/G417.htm 
give you the choice to test them. Comment from parenti...Adding to the previous comment: look in
http://www.cpdee.ufmg.br/simtel/simtel_index_mathcopr.html 
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Free Tool: Path Explorer

An intuitive utility to help find the CSS path to UI elements on a webpage. These paths are used frequently in a variety of front-end development and QA automation tasks.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now