We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

387 emulator

Gino121597
Gino121597 asked
on
Medium Priority
308 Views
Last Modified: 2009-12-16
I'm searching for a free 387 emulator tha runs under Windows 3.11.
If You have one, please mail to:

             s85201@cclix1.polito.it
Comment
Watch Question

Commented:
Dear Gino,

387 is half a 386DX, as you probably know.

It is - to be exact - a working FP-unit picked from the 'bad'-die-pile in Intels founderies about 5 years ago.

Either your software is able to emulate the missing floating-point-unit, or you should visit one of the second-hand-PC-vendors and replace your 386SX with a 386DX (upgrade-costs about 2 US$)

Everything else does not make sense in your case.

regards

tabit

Commented:
Usually 387 emulators did not perform well both in WIN 3.11 and in DOS. They tend to make your system unstable conflicting with other TSR and so on and are/not are able to work in protected mode. I think it is better to go and buy a few dollars chip (a real 387).

Anyway
http://www.irtech.com/treehous/files/G417.htm 
give you the choice to test them.

Commented:
Adding to the previous comment: look in
http://www.cpdee.ufmg.br/simtel/simtel_index_mathcopr.html

Author

Commented:
Sorry, but this is a hardware solution, and I would prefer a sotfware solution, till my applications are't so intensive fpu users

Commented:
If you want the software-solution, use it. Parenti recommend an FPU-emulator. But for performance-reasons I would strongly recommend the 2$-upgrade to a 386DX (which "includes" the 387)

Never emulate something that you can have in hardware for the same price. You can expect in the case of the 387, that the performance will be worse than without the emulator.

Commented:
Yoooh Tabit ...

Where did you get the idea that a 386 contains a copro ???

you're mixing things up a little , 486 dx contains a copro
but not the 386 ... :-)

to much champagne on christmas evening perhaps ... ho ho ho

merry christmas ...

Commented:
evil ed:

sorry, I missed that. I switched directly from 286 to 486SX to Pentium. But you would certainly agree to the point that to have a hardware 387 for 2 bucks is a much better solution that to slow down the slow 386 with an emulator.

Gino:

did you try the emulator parenti recommended?
Commented:
I cannot understand in which sense the SW I proposed you are an HW solutions. May be that some mis-alligment in the chat has been there.

So I only can give you again the pointers to the SW-only solution(s) you can try (you will find a tenth of them for any pointer!)

1) http://www.irtech.com/treehous/files/G417.htm 
2) http://www.cpdee.ufmg.br/simtel/simtel_index_mathcopr.html 

I want to recall that usually the 387 emulators did not perform well both in WIN 3.11 and in DOS (you must choose). They tend to make your system unstable conflicting with other TSR and so on and are/not are able to work in protected mode.

If you were going to work with it,  I definitively think it could be better to go and buy a few dollars chip (a real 387), but if you are playing you can try.

I think that no more can be said on the matter.

My best regards.

Anyway
http://www.irtech.com/treehous/files/G417.htm 
give you the choice to test them. Comment from parenti...Adding to the previous comment: look in
http://www.cpdee.ufmg.br/simtel/simtel_index_mathcopr.html 

Not the solution you were looking for? Getting a personalized solution is easy.

Ask the Experts
Access more of Experts Exchange with a free account
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Create a free account to continue.

Limited access with a free account allows you to:

  • View three pieces of content (articles, solutions, posts, and videos)
  • Ask the experts questions (counted toward content limit)
  • Customize your dashboard and profile

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.