Red Hat 5/gcc 2.7.2.3-8 --fcvt()function

I was previously working on a Red Hat 4.0 system and everything was fine, until we upgraded to 5.0 and went from gcc 2.7.2-9 to gcc 2.7.2.3-8.  Now, a software product I use is having problems.  I'm writing programs in C and the software is also written in C.  The product calls a function called fcvt() (looks like this and returns a string:
                               fcvt( 0, 2, &decpt, &sign )
which seems to affect formatting of floating point decimals.  The product is looking for the string that is returned to be "00" and both decpt and sign to be 0.  The problem is that with the new version of gcc, fcvt() returns "000" and decpt=1.  I can buy another product to work around this, but I was thinking it would be easier to rewrite fcvt() since it was so small.  If anyone has any knowledge of this could you possibly write a version of fcvt() that solves this and possibly give me more information or resources to look at?  I'm anxious for any response!  If points are a problems, that can be easily fixed.  Thanks.

Webslider
websliderAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

jhanceCommented:
Why not get the RTL source for 2.7.2-9 and extract the old fcvt code?

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
websliderAuthor Commented:
You can't do this for sure because gcc 2.7.2.3-8 switched to using glibc and not libc so the new library may have other functions it uses that the fcvt() function in gcc2.7.2-9 calls that won't work or won't work as expected.

I've found an alternative answer, so thanks much.
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Linux Distributions

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.