Layering or Private Inheritance

I am currently developing a basic database application using CodeBase 6.3.  I want to access all Codebase classes via my own classes in order to abstract(??) the majority of my code from CodeBase so that in the event that I change database engines down the track, switching over will be a relatively easy task.

Codebase uses a number of classes, one of which (Code4) is a class controlling data on a global basis, maintaining error codes and general determining the way data files will behave.  Another class (Data4) controls the data files themselves.  Data4 requires access to the Code4 class for certain functions however I do not want the Code4 member to be visible on a public basis.

Let's call my classes Class A (my equivalent of Code4) and Class B (my equivalent of Data4).  I am unsure as to which of the following methods to use:

a) Private Inheritance: Class A derived privately from Code4 and declaring Class B as a friend to allow access to Code4 members.
b) Layering: Class A contains a private member variable Code4 and declaring Class B as a friend.
c) A better method I have missed.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.  Please reply via private email to woodster@wantree.com.au as well as to the newsgroup as my newsfeed is not the best.

Thanks in advance.

Sean Hannan
spearheadAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
yonatConnect With a Mentor Commented:
Take a look at http://www.kinetica.com/ootips/persistent-objects.html . There is some discussion, links to products that do this (so you don't have to write it yourself) and links to articles (in case you insist on writing this yourself).

As you can see, this is never simple. The proxy solutions is correct, but a just saying "proxy" does not explain how to create a full solution. If you want to write such a thing, you really need to read at least one or two articles about this subject.

BTW, one of the easiest ways to do such things is explained at http://www.sigs.com/publications/docs/cppr/9605/cppr9605.f.cohen.html . I am metioning this here since there is no link to it from the page I mantioned above.

Good luck!
0
 
GregLCommented:
What you are trying to acheive is database independance.  THe proposed methods you describe cannot achieve this because your implementation is using knowledge that Code4 needs Data4.  My suggestion is to write a single wrapper class that uses Code4 and Data4, but exports a simple public interface for the eventual application to use.  With this approach a new database just means you rewrite one class.

Greg L.
0
 
alexoCommented:
I'd suggest:
c) Write a single class X that has Code4 and Data4 as members.
0
The new generation of project management tools

With monday.com’s project management tool, you can see what everyone on your team is working in a single glance. Its intuitive dashboards are customizable, so you can create systems that work for you.

 
spearheadAuthor Commented:
Unfortunately, CodeBase has a number of classes in addition to the Code4 and Data4 classes meaning that wrapping all of the functionality into a single class would be cumbersome and (I believe) inefficient.  I am not "recoding classes" on a 1 for 1 basis but grouping multiple classes into one of my own where possible.  The Code4 and Data4 classes were used in the example as this is the starting point for CodeBase files.  The fact that Data4 needs Code4 will not (I believe) be a problem as ClassA and ClassB are accessed publicly and the use of the Data4 and Code4 members is internal to these new classes.
0
 
spearheadAuthor Commented:
By the way - Don't worry about the private email/news feed comment at the bottom of the original question.  I just noticed it still there and as you can probably guess, this question was also posted on USENET . . . Ooops.
0
 
slinkyCommented:
I would create a separate a proxy class to represent the interface to your database classes i.e. abstract the database access to a higher level so that the application only accesses the database via the proxy view. a proxy is a standard pattern for this sort of job.
0
 
spearheadAuthor Commented:
Although the answer didn't detail anything specific, I was able to take some information from the links you gace and then search for some more information to finally obtain relevant information for my requirements.

Thanks for the help
0
All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.